And I'm saying your claim that you can't find anything is ridiculous at best unless you are new to google.I was asking not claiming.
Just put in the words 'hanson' and 'faruqi' and you get the history you keep asking about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And I'm saying your claim that you can't find anything is ridiculous at best unless you are new to google.I was asking not claiming.
I actually did put in hanson v faruqi and what come up is what hanson said in this latest incident.And I'm saying your claim that you can't find anything is ridiculous at best unless you are new to google.
Just put in the words 'hanson' and 'faruqi' and you get the history you keep asking about.
Wasn't that hard to find.Yeah wouldn't be surprised.
I'm just curious if Faruqi provoked her directly, can't find anything.
Umm Maggie,Wasn't that hard to find.
Hanson tweeted at Faruqi last year, suggesting she “p*** off” back to Pakistan (the country of the Greens senator’s birth), now the subject of an ongoing legal case about the Racial Discrimination Act.
Hanson declined to retract her statements, leading to a motion demanding she apologise for “foul and racially discriminatory things which amount to ‘go back to where you came from’.”
‘There’s a tissue here for you’
Hanson refused and read her comments into the Hansard a second time while denying they were discriminatory.
“There’s a tissue here for you if you’d like,” she said. “I used to make those same statements at immigration ceremonies to people, and they accepted.”
“If you don’t see yourself as loving this country and abiding by the laws of the country, I have no problem,” she said.
“I will actually take you to the airport and put you on a plane and wave you away.”
Which post of yours stated you knew this?Umm Maggie,
I already know this, and I've been clear as to what I'm asking, what provoked the one neuron leader to make these comments? If at all? >in regards to this instance<
If you had read this conversation since I originally asked you'd know I'd read the article, and you'd know I googled to find any provocation and you'd know I stated I couldn't find any on Faruqi's part >in this instance< (the post above yours is a clear indicator).
Even my post you replied to is a clear indication of my query, which is not in your reply > in regards to this instance<
What you've quoted was solely from the one neuron leader, and you'd know that wasn't was I was querying.
I knew this? No I'm stating you would know what I was asking before you even replied, if you'd read the discussion.Which post of yours stated you knew this?
You seem to want to believe that Hanson was provoked which still doesn't make it okay.
Though my post was quite clear also.I knew this? No I'm stating you would know what I was asking before you even replied, if you'd read the discussion.
No I'm not looking to absolve of hanson, merely asking if there was any provocation. This is a clear misinterpretation on your part.
Not sure how you can't grasp this, my posts are very clear. Especially my last reply to you.
I'll pm you.Though my post was quite clear also.
Welcome to Howard's legacy. So much for creating an Australia that's "comfortable and relaxed" .
Welcome to Howard's legacy. So much for creating an Australia that's "comfortable and relaxed" .
Welcome to Howard's legacy. So much for creating an Australia that's "comfortable and relaxed" .
Excellent summation.The people whose votes he was buying at the time have done very nicely. Everyone else not so much.
Excellent summation.
A war criminal who is complicit in the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians and the collapse of a country's economy in the hunt for Weapons of Mass Destruction that NEVER existed.So little Johnny just took us to war without proper documentation or a report on what it would entail or cost.