- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,880
- 54,199
- AFL Club
- Geelong
What if Cerra turns into a bust?Will either turn out to be better than Cerra or a total bust.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What if Cerra turns into a bust?Will either turn out to be better than Cerra or a total bust.
Just trying to see if there's assets that could be brought to a Lobb trade I assume. The trade sounds like its agreed. People just taking the opportunity to slander each other nowPick 27 was never enough for a contracted player but 22 is fair for a kid that's played what under 15 games in 2 years? His clearly not in Geelongs best and wasn't even sighted in the 23 team finals line-ups.
Not sure what the hold up is.
Who said it’s agreed??Just trying to see if there's assets that could be brought to a Lobb trade I assume. The trade sounds like its agreed. People just taking the opportunity to slander each other now
They're going to go all out war over a 3 selection difference? I don't think soWho said it’s agreed??
Or... Freo have tabled pick 22 because they and Clark and his management were told that's what would get the trade done. In the meantime, we've gone about our business and aquired pick 19 and Wells has shifted the goal posts requesting that pick, all while Clark has himself started moving his stuff back to Perth and put his car on a train back to WA.What’s going on with this one?? From the silence it sounds like geelong has said 19 or come back next year basically??
surely everyone is happy with that. Geelong keep a player they don’t want to shop, and freo get to keep their prized picks.
now it’s just a wait and see if Clark has a breakout season and costs next years first, or if he fizzles and costs a low pick
Bigger things going on for both clubs.What’s going on with this one?? From the silence it sounds like geelong has said 19 or come back next year basically??
surely everyone is happy with that. Geelong keep a player they don’t want to shop, and freo get to keep their prized picks.
now it’s just a wait and see if Clark has a breakout season and costs next years first, or if he fizzles and costs a low pick
Western Australian clubs really know how to fxxk with heads of their home grown talent. Promise them a long contracts, but go missing when they have to step up for a trade. Funny lot over in the west.
I wish Fremantle went missing just a little more often than they do, got a long history of staying in trades they should have walked away from. Maybe we can make this one a new leaf.
Western Australian clubs really know how to fxxk with heads of their home grown talent. Promise them a long contracts, but go missing when they have to step up for a trade. Funny lot over in the west.
They're going to go all out war over a 3 selection difference? I don't think so
True. For what it’s worth if 22 was the only viable pick we probably would take it but with 19 also available to be traded it’s reasonable to expect we’d request it for a contracted player who was a former first round pick offered a 4 year deal. Freo, to my mind, are being petulant. If Clark was uncontracted, completely different story.
Sounds like Geelong are going to keep him.
Did I fall asleep for a week and miss the end of trade week or are you just playing the man?
19 has extra value being the first pick of night two and Fremantle have already moved from 27 to 22 for a guy that's played 14 games in the last two years. It'd be just as easy to claim that it's Geelong being petulant but more likely both clubs are simply focused elsewhere today and the deal will be signed off by Wednesday.
I love it when Freo get all chippy and start talking big about the next Fyfe they will be acquiring at either of their rolled gold picks #21 or #24/25 which is what they have.
Until they look at the reality of last 10 years drafting at that range. You’re definitely a forgiving and resilient bunch I’ll give you that
No it isn't reasonable.True. For what it’s worth if 22 was the only viable pick we probably would take it but with 19 also available to be traded it’s reasonable to expect we’d request it for a contracted player who was a former first round pick offered a 4 year deal. Freo, to my mind, are being petulant. If Clark was uncontracted, completely different story.
No it isn't reasonable.
You gave a verbal undertaking that 22 would be sufficient to get the trade done, then you went back on your word. It' grubby and unethical. I don't personally find that reasonable negotiation.Beg to differ. He’s contracted. You’ve offered him a long deal. It’s not that fxxking hard. And now leave the kid hanging…
You gave a verbal undertaking that 22 would be sufficient to get the trade done, then you went back on your word. It' grubby and unethical. I don't personally find that reasonable negotiation.
You gave a verbal undertaking that 22 would be sufficient to get the trade done, then you went back on your word. It' grubby and unethical. I don't personally find that reasonable negotiation.
And now leave the kid hanging…
Didn't Clark decide against putting in the trade request last year because he was offered more gametime this year? In terms of broken promises to Clark Freo isn't the villain.
True. For what it’s worth if 22 was the only viable pick we probably would take it but with 19 also available to be traded it’s reasonable to expect we’d request it for a contracted player who was a former first round pick offered a 4 year deal. Freo, to my mind, are being petulant. If Clark was uncontracted, completely different story.