Judd's been cited

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: judd offered a week

Yeah thats right Goodes actually ran up behind somewones back and purposefully punched them in the back when they weren't looking. Hmm how many did he get i forget
yep but that doesn't matter does it.:eek:
because a west coast player did it they must be guilty:rolleyes:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: judd offered a week

Goodes should have got a week - Judd should have got probably more than a week - But they are AFL love childs.

how cna you compare the 2 Goodes was a purposefull premeditated punch from behind, some would say this is a dog act. Judd had 2 players on top of him, one with an elbow in his throat, and he has accidently put his hand on someones face (whether it was eye or noe vistim says no) in an attempt to get him off so he can breathe
 
yeh and freo aint?

eagles should appeal and use ben hollands reprimand as an example - his eye gouge on BJ was much worse

Thanks captain obvious. We all know he will get off with an appeal. Thats how the AFL/MRP has made it.
 
Umpire should be suspended for a week - I thought the rule was if it is above the shoulder then it was a free kick - umpire was right in the front of the incident and didnt pay any frees and now we have all supporters totally confused.

If Judd is to sent to the tribunal he should be reprimanded as it was a wrong thing to do (touch another players eye) but it was accidental.
 
Re: judd offered a week

how cna you compare the 2 Goodes was a purposefull premeditated punch from behind, some would say this is a dog act. Judd had 2 players on top of him, one with an elbow in his throat, and he has accidently put his hand on someones face (whether it was eye or noe vistim says no) in an attempt to get him off so he can breathe

dunno stupid - ask someone if they would prefer a push in the back or a finger nail in their eye:rolleyes:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Judd's been cited

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top