Miguel Sanchez
(Unique injury) TBC
Rioli third number.
Wait until you realise Port don’t hold their captains original number when he takes the #
They do now, ever since Tredrea gave up the captaincy and booted Danyle Pearce out of the #16.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rioli third number.
Wait until you realise Port don’t hold their captains original number when he takes the #
1 and 4 will be available next year3 should be saved for Chad or Fred “Freddy the Jet” Rodriguez, if either lands at the club. Not a fan of Baker & Graham getting numbers like 3 & 17. Some will say it’s just a number & not that deep, but that’s absolute trash & you all know it.
16: Baker
17: Shanahan
23: Maric
26: Gross
27 J.Williams
31: Edwards
34: Graham
35: Grego
37: Sellwood or Denver Grainger-Barrass
38: Champion
41: Davis
42: Owies
I have a feeling that the number 3 would have been among Bakers list of trade demands though.
The jumper numbers are a nice link to the past but this isn’t the NBA and nobody in a league full of token gestures is ‘retiring’ numbers, outside of perhaps an untimely death, even then it’s unlikely to be ‘forever’.
Making the captain wear number 1 sounds like something an U14s team would do.Wait until you realise Port don’t hold their captains original number when he takes the #
They do now, ever since Tredrea gave up the captaincy and booted Danyle Pearce out of the #16.
Given they've got 0-99 (and 00 as well I'm pretty sure) to use, where as AFL only allows the use of 1-50, I don't see it happening.I'd rather we don't go down the route of the NBA where literally a dozen numbers or more cannot be used.
On that note, John McCarthy's #35 has just been unretired, with the blessing of his family.
I'd rather we don't go down the route of the NBA where literally a dozen numbers or more cannot be used.
I wouldn't mind if just one or two numbers were retired. Had the club retired Mainy's #3 in 2007 that would've been a nice gesture but not retiring it wasn't disrespectful or anything.
They actually did retire it for three years.
Firmly agreeRetiring numbers (even temporarily) is stupid.
But I feel this is an unpopular take (unlike me, I know).