
- Mar 1, 2014
- 14,967
- 18,921
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Cronulla Sutherland Sharks
Warren went and asked after he spoke to Darren Cahill, who recommended to Koch that Warren replace him.
What is presumptuous about Warren then asking to be considered for the board after he was recommended by Darren??
If Darren didn't tell Warren he recommended him, Warren probably would have never considered a board position.
We only had 1 elite sports industry person on our board, they have seen how things work, they resigned due to international travel commitments and being out of Oz for about 35 weeks a year, and have recommended one of our most elite players from our AFL era, arguably our most driven, to replace him - then he is rejected by some bullshit "good governance and transparency" line.
So Koch is saying to Kathy Nagle you are really useless because when a past player wants to run for the board he should run for the member elected position. Warren will run against you in late 2023/2024, so you are effectively terminated??
Who is going to produce more good for the football part of the business, Kathy Nagle over 12 months or Warren next February. Its madness.
Cannot agree, but that is what living in a free society is all about. It is not up to Darren Cahill to nominate who gets his seat on the Board it is the Board's prerogative to fill the casual vacancy with the person they think will best serve the interests of the footy club. I stand by my original statement as I think an individual knocking on the door saying Joe Blow has nominated me to take his set on the Board so when do I start is very presumptuous as it shows little knowledge of due process. As I have explained I do not like the system but it is the one we work with. What you and those who agree with you seem to be suggesting is that existing Board members should be able nominate their mates for Board vacancies. Would you be happy if Cos Cardone decided to pull the pin and nominated one of his mates from McGuire Media to fill his spot? I do not give a rat's what Killer Cahill wants as he is pissing off after less than four years in the job so given his situation maybe he was not the best choice for a Board position? If the Board intends to replace like with like they will go for someone with an international sporting background. Maybe some one like Anna Meares who is already a Port Adelaide Ambassador would be a good choice? If not maybe Kyle Chalmers or Bruce Djite who are also Port Ambassadors could fill the role, unlike some past appointments they are all Port supporters. You never know the nett gain at the end of 2023 might be that we have Warren Tredrea and one of the aforementioned on the Board.
As for Kathy Nagle David Koch does not have to say anything to Kathy as she will understand the situation and will have the opportunity to run against Tredders at the end of the year, if he is still interested. About the only semblance of a democratic process we have left in the Club is the election of Member Nominees and no one should have a problem with that. In any case as you know the AFL has to rubber stamp Board appointments and maybe they have objections to Warren Tredrea getting a shot it- I am not saying they would veto an appointment but in these strange times who knows?
In any case Tredders does not seem to be up in arms about the rejection and we appear to have supporters who are more upset than Tredders. Hopefully there will be some rational and relevant questions asked at the AGM without creating a circus which plays into the media's hands.