List Mgmt. List Management 2024-25

[PeacefulWarrior]

Him and Konstanty both will be delisted, Konstanty was top 20 pick so will be interesting to see if someone picks em up

We aren’t going after Kostanty we have Jed

 

[Addy23]

We aren’t going after Kostanty we have Jed

Didn't say we were

 

[PeacefulWarrior]

Didn't say we were

Twas a joke mate

 

[Addy23]

Twas a joke mate

I gathered, Jed has secretly signed a lifetime contract

 

[Peninsula Boy]

More of a drafting issue than anything. If those players go on to better careers elsewhere then we can be concerned about development. Guys like Howard and Austin were never going to be great players.

We got a real steal in Logan Evans.

There is definitely a case that shows that traded bigs haven't come back to haunt us but the complete and utter dearth of development of talls over the last decade or so under Hinkley is majorly concerning and goes a decent way in understanding why he is such an average coach at best and shows a strong disconnect between the list guys and the coaching staff.

And then you have to depend on trades and sometime you have to pay way overs and sometimes a team like Geelong doesn't want to play ball.

After a while, a lack of development of talls means the list development guys know they need a more finished product than a raw draftee.

In the end, it's just another broken string on his bow.

 

[JHF1870]

There is definitely a case that shows that traded bigs haven't come back to haunt us but the complete and utter dearth of development of talls over the last decade or so under Hinkley is majorly concerning and goes a decent way in understanding why he is such an average coach at best and shows a strong disconnect between the list guys and the coaching staff.

And then you have to depend on trades and sometime you have to pay way overs and sometimes a team like Geelong doesn't want to play ball.

After a while, a lack of development of talls means the list development guys know they need a more finished product than a raw draftee.

In the end, it's just another broken strong on his bow.

Is Hinkley really in charge of development? No one man is responsible for that.

I still want him gone.

 

[wayb2912]

Malthouse thinks we had too many ball winners in the midfield, or moreso the wrong mix (In the Prelim) and is why we failed. He's saying two max. So that might look like:

Wines, JHF and Butters but don't think we can have Rozee, JHF and Butters together.

We should play Rozee forward or HBF like Whitfield

On PHN110 using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Coobk001]

We should play Rozee forward or HBF like Whitfield

On PHN110 using BigFooty.com mobile app

I'm hoping like hell that the coaching staff realise one of the biggest answers to our small forward issue is right there, and will also remove a problem from our midfield mix.

 

[VineValerian]

There is definitely a case that shows that traded bigs haven't come back to haunt us but the complete and utter dearth of development of talls over the last decade or so under Hinkley is majorly concerning and goes a decent way in understanding why he is such an average coach at best and shows a strong disconnect between the list guys and the coaching staff.

And then you have to depend on trades and sometime you have to pay way overs and sometimes a team like Geelong doesn't want to play ball.

After a while, a lack of development of talls means the list development guys know they need a more finished product than a raw draftee.

In the end, it's just another broken strong on his bow.

Like as in Strongbow cider?

 

[PortAdelFC1997]

Malthouse thinks we had too many ball winners in the midfield, or moreso the wrong mix (In the Prelim) and is why we failed. He's saying two max. So that might look like:

Wines, JHF and Butters but don't think we can have Rozee, JHF and Butters together.

The main issue is that Butters, JHF and Rozee all want to chase and win the ball and thereby getting themselves exposed defensively at the centre square for easy clearances.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

Adam

 

[Peninsula Boy]

Is Hinkley really in charge of development? No one man is responsible for that.

I still want him gone.

In the end, the head coach is the person you blame for on field performance.

 

[Rash]

I hope port get matt owies i rate him quite highly, but by no means involve him in the houston deal. that would be diluting our returns from carlton

 

[Coobk001]

Adam

Take Lord & Young out of the deal and it probably aint far off the mark.

 

[Peninsula Boy]

I appreciate the Coondog slapping one out.

 

[Adz2332]

I actually rate young. 202cms key back. Played a bit of ruck. Could be a break glass back up ruckman.
Take lord out and I'll do it

Gc get reemed in coons scenario though

 

[Adz2332]

Port
Out Houston and 54
In pick 11 and luko

Carlton
Out pick 11 future 2nd
In
Houston pick 54

Gc
Out
Luko
In
Port future 2nd Carlton future 2nd

 

[Enviable Tradition]

Port
Out Houston and 54
In pick 11 and luko

I see the end net result being very similar to this.

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Jojay]

We need to keep Lord.

 

[Rash]

Cal Twomey thinks Perryman isnt 100% Collingwood bound, he still thinks we are in the race and also the giants

 

[Enviable Tradition]

I just have a gut feeling Perryman still wants to come here.

It may be depending on Dan 100% going though which complicates it given the free agency/trade timing.

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Jojay]

There's an air of desperation with Collingwood. They would have to have the oldest list in the comp

 

[Long live PAFC]

Adam

Not sure we need Owies - more marking small than defensive, crumbing small. Young would be handy tall back up but reckon he’ll be DFA territory.

Add a second rounder or future second and I’m taking that deal.

 

[PJ Power]

Port
Out Houston and 54
In pick 11 and luko

Carlton
Out pick 11 future 2nd
In
Houston pick 54

Gc
Out
Luko
In
Port future 2nd Carlton future 2nd

I don't understand why our own supporters keep selling us short.
Houston is worth pick 11 and Luko. That is the minimum as it is barely the equivalent of two first-round picks - probably pick 11 and pick 17-20 tbh. Why we would then add in pick 54 is beyond me?

What part of two first-round picks do people not understand?
The only exception is if one of those picks comes in the top 6.

 

[Gryllis]

There's an air of desperation with Collingwood. They would have to have the oldest list in the comp

I'm surprised they've keep so many 30+ year olds - and the amount 33+ is unusual.

But maybe that's why is an easy sell to offer Perryman the role he wants. They'll be close to 10 retirements in the next 2-3 years, let alone delistings. Plenty of opportunities.