List Mgmt. List Management 2024-25

Remove this Banner Ad

Trade 1
Port : Luko & Pick 23
GC : Port FP1

Trade 2
Collingwood : Pick 13 & Pick 29
GC : Noble & Collingwood FP1

Trade 3
Port : Pick 13, Pick 29, Pick 36 & Richards
Collingwood : Houston & 39

Net result :
Port Gain : Pick 13, Pick 23, Pick 29, Pick 36, Luko, Richards
Port Lose : FP1, Pick 39, Houston

Just for fun : Pick 58 > Caleb Daniels
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Trade 3
Port : Pick 13, Pick 29, Pick 36 & Richards
Collingwood : Houston & 39
If the list managers are 100% confident that there's little difference between having 29 & 36, and another first rounder, then I'd be happy. However 29 and 36 shouldn't be enough. It needs to be a lower pick. In this scenario we also shouldn't be sending 39 their way, it'd be more like the 58 pick.
 
Very hesitant to go into next year without a F1. It could easily be a top 10 pick when shit hits the fan
GC want picks for next year where our future first rounder will be traded for Luko, the argy nargy will be around the steak knives where hopefully, we get a second rounder (for this) year back.
 
Trade 1
Port : Luko & Pick 23
GC : Port FP1

Trade 2
Collingwood : Pick 13 & Pick 29
GC : Noble & Collingwood FP1

Trade 3
Port : Pick 13, Pick 29, Pick 36 & Richards
Collingwood : Houston & 39

Net result :
Port Gain : Pick 13, Pick 23, Pick 29, Pick 36, Luko, Richards
Port Lose : FP1, Pick 39, Houston

Just for fun : Pick 58 > Caleb Daniels
Broken down, we hand Collingwood Houston for pick 13, pick 29 and Richards. That’s up there with the crap we accepted from Freo for Carr in 2004.
We do ok from the Luko deal but it’s still a no from me. Having said that, I suspect this is what will happen.
 
Broken down, we hand Collingwood Houston for pick 13, pick 29 and Richards. That’s up there with the crap we accepted from Freo for Carr in 2004.
We do ok from the Luko deal but it’s still a no from me. Having said that, I suspect this is what will happen.
I’d like Collingwood to do the GC deal and we say no. Carlton or Collingwood, I’d like their first selection not pick 13, they can be behind us.
 
Trade 1
Port : Luko & Pick 23
GC : Port FP1

Trade 2
Collingwood : Pick 13 & Pick 29
GC : Noble & Collingwood FP1

Trade 3
Port : Pick 13, Pick 29, Pick 36 & Richards
Collingwood : Houston & 39

Net result :
Port Gain : Pick 13, Pick 23, Pick 29, Pick 36, Luko, Richards
Port Lose : FP1, Pick 39, Houston

Just for fun : Pick 58 > Caleb Daniels
Pick 13 for FP1 is a draw. So essentially you have us giving up a reigning dual AA contracted for three years without getting a single extra first rounder in return, and also going into next year without a first rounder. Wind the ****ing club up if we did anything approaching this deal.
 
Port: St K R3 (Pick 47)
St K: Soldo

Port: Luko & his contract
GCS: St K R3 (Pick 47) & his contract off their books

Melb: Geel R1 (Pick 17) & R2 (Pick 38)
Geel: Oliver & Melb R2 (Pick 28)

Port: Melb R1 (Pick 5) & Geel R1 (Pick 17)
Melb: Houston

Richards walks to the draft and Port pick him up with 39

Port Receive: Pick 5, 17, Luko & Richards
Port give: Pick 39, Houston & Soldo

This is my opinon and I dont think Luko is worth selling the farm for. He cant get a game under Dimma FFS. I get that he is going to be a required player if/when Marshall retires but Luko is missing piece 999.

Im probably overrating Oliver as well but Port need to get back into the draft for the time after Hinkley.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. List Management 2024-25

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top