-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Malceski for Spida?????????
- Thread starter smasher
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Malceski.. hell no. That boy isn't going anywhere. None of the 22 boys who played on Saturday are going anywhere.
If we let Malceski go, they'd better let ASDA loose in the office as the recruitment staff would have to be on drugs.
This kid has had all the development work put into him for what? To pass that on to someone else, dreaming (hopefully)
This kid has had all the development work put into him for what? To pass that on to someone else, dreaming (hopefully)
Don't worry. It won't happen. Mal would be a required player by now. And I seriously doubt that Roos would back down and offer the hawks higher than 3rd pick.
They might, however, get a young player who isn't likely to to be in the senior group on a regular basis any time soon.
They might, however, get a young player who isn't likely to to be in the senior group on a regular basis any time soon.
Tuco said:
Like who?
bigswan
Senior List
Willoughby, Schmidt, Moore or Spriggs. Nothing more.
- Banned
- #8
philhawk said:I'm not even sure if the Swans would consider this, but i'll throw it up anyway.
Spida + Pick 24 ------> Swans
Pick 15 ----> Carlton
Bret Thornton -----> Hawks
Just a thought.
Malceski is a no go zone for other clubs and I would hate it if they draft him for an older player
Not a chance in hell.
bigswan said:
Would the swans consider sending one of the above players to Carlton if they received Spida?
The Hawks could then give Carlton pick 24, and THornton would move to Hawthorn.
IMO no club loses, but the Hawks gain!
we have finally got it right. Jolly is already a premiership ruckman(how could he be focused after his wife gave birth) and now that Doyle is fit he will only get better.leave spida at hawthorn to get stuck in his own web of deceit. we don't need him as a ruckman didn't cost us a premiership.
LOBBY007 said:we don't need him as a ruckman didn't cost us a premiership.
Are you kidding? Jolly and Doyle 'Gardinered' you guys!
Ed_Gein
Very good. But brick not hit back!
- Dec 17, 2003
- 17,871
- 12,042
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Glasgow Rangers, Liverpool, Storm.
Moore? He just signed a new 3 year deal with the Swans. What would be the point in that if we were to trade him off to the Hawks?
Ed_Gein
Very good. But brick not hit back!
- Dec 17, 2003
- 17,871
- 12,042
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Glasgow Rangers, Liverpool, Storm.
Bennycoff said:
I gather from what Roos said that our 1st and 2nd round picks are off limits. Willing to settle for a 3rd round?
Blacky
The King
- May 9, 2006
- 46,820
- 68,048
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Denver Broncos & Gold City Royals
What a joke this would be...
How can a guy who missed most of the season and has 2 years in him max, be worth a player of Malceski's potential!
I would be almost as annoyed if we trade our first rounder this year too!
How can a guy who missed most of the season and has 2 years in him max, be worth a player of Malceski's potential!
I would be almost as annoyed if we trade our first rounder this year too!
I agree Malceski is a player I wouldn't trade, however if the Hawks want one of our best 22 then a deal that could satisfy would be:
everitt + pick 6 for pick 15 + buchanan
Yes we would be giving up a young preimership player but one that could possibly be replaced by a Moore, Schmidt or Willoughby.
Also just think of the possible player that pick 6 might get us
You need to give up quality to get quality!
everitt + pick 6 for pick 15 + buchanan
Yes we would be giving up a young preimership player but one that could possibly be replaced by a Moore, Schmidt or Willoughby.
Also just think of the possible player that pick 6 might get us
You need to give up quality to get quality!
BrissoMash
Rookie
- Sep 28, 2006
- 26
- 0
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Oscar said:
NOW we're talking!!!!
DO IT!
Oscar said:I agree Malceski is a player I wouldn't trade, however if the Hawks want one of our best 22 then a deal that could satisfy would be:
everitt + pick 6 for pick 15 + buchanan
Yes we would be giving up a young preimership player but one that could possibly be replaced by a Moore, Schmidt or Willoughby.
Also just think of the possible player that pick 6 might get us
You need to give up quality to get quality!
no..
- Banned
- #25
I actually think Oscar's suggestion is worth considering. Pick 6 would mean we would pick up one of the premier youngsters in the country.
