All these coaching jobs have a 6 month clause - that is you only have to pay them 6 months if you sack them.
Not all of them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All these coaching jobs have a 6 month clause - that is you only have to pay them 6 months if you sack them.
Would depend when the new deal kicks in, and when the coach signed their contract I reckonLongmuir was still talking about 6months
might be 12 months only for new contracts ie. from the day announced Nicks would now qualify Longmuir may not.Longmuir was still talking about 6months
Surely you're not describing last year as mediocre?If the club has another mediocre year, we absolutely have to sack him.
We cannot afford to waste another 2 years right when we should be hitting our straps.
We found a positive.I have a slightly different take.
If Nicks spent this year coaching for his survival, he would be more inclined to stick to conservative selections and no variation in game style.
He now has some certainty to allow for more flexible thinking - it is just a matter of seeing if he has the capacity to do that.
Am I surprised?Surely no one was actually surprised by this signing
Burgess would be on a fair bit.If he's only on $400k I would expect the rest of our football department to be stacked, which it isn't
Not all of them.
Obviously we are hence the resigningAm I surprised?
Given the club Admin. satisfaction with mediocrity (reflected in the decision),
no,
but I am disappointed.
I'll accept the decision (having no choice) and hope like hell that I am wrong about Nicks.
The 6 month clause is for all senior coaches for all clubs.
Re-signing after a Round One loss where we checks notes kick one goal in the first half and only played about 17mins of actual football?
Sold!
Damn !!! .....fancy not making the Finals in each year of a rebuild ....the audacityThe club being 100% sure on a coach that hasn't made finals yet is bad
Tit's only for AFL-assisted clubs like Suns and St Kilda.
AFL insists on six-month payout clauses for coaches
New guidelines to AFL-funded clubs limits payouts regardless of the length of contracts. But the coaches' association believes it gives incompetent boards a ''get-out-of-jail-free'' card.www.theage.com.au
Agree totally. Saturday's Crows looked as inept for a bit over 3 quarters as the Crows early last year.The club being 100% sure on a coach that hasn't made finals yet is bad
It didn't take Houdini to work out, the essence of the agreement was already settled .....OK shoot me George Kramer ...I missed the actual announcement by a weekWhy after round 1?
He was probably already signed
How would you describe it?Surely you're not describing last year as mediocre?
IF Hardwick was to be exempted from the AFL Coach payout policy .....it would rebound onto all other AFL Clubs facing a coaching payoutI find it hard to believe Hardwick would agree to such a clause.
Some coaches have more negotiating power than others.
Thats 4 years ago, a bit has happened since then.AFL insists on six-month payout clauses for coaches
View attachment 1934536
The Age
https://www.theage.com.au › Sport › AFL › AFL 2020
18 Sept 2020 — The new guideline mandates a maximum six-month settlement to any sacked coach at an AFL-funded club regardless of the length of his contract.
You’re back on the scene, laid low after our loss on the weekend?Damn !!! .....fancy not making the Finals in each year of a rebuild ....the audacity
Clarko and Mitchell are in real trouble then
... of many.ANOTHER Short-sighted move we may come to regret ...
Damn !!! .....fancy not making the Finals in each year of a rebuild ....the audacity
Clarko and Mitchell are in real trouble then
Tell me the changes where's it has changed ?Thats 4 years ago, a bit has happened since then.