![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/adelaide.png)
GROTTO
TheBrownDog
- Jul 5, 2013
- 67,973
- 92,987
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The Crows need to learn the mistakes the Pies made when they threw away Ginnivan for Schultz over his pre game antics.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Semi Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
This would have been a move by the Leadership group, not the Coach in isolation
Set standards …. Rachele fits into the team, not Rachele doing his own ****
I endorse the move …. Dawson isn’t a clown & his background of SYD would not tolerate a player going outside team first
We want charactersTo his credit he said to the media today we don't want to be robots and have characters in the game.
Nothing team first about scapegoating and hanging out a young player to dry.
Quite the opposite and not the first time it has happened. It's a gutless move by Nicks if it happens again.
Surprise surpriseThis would have been a move by the Leadership group, not the Coach in isolation
Set standards …. Rachele fits into the team, not Rachele doing his own ****
I endorse the move …. Dawson isn’t a clown & his background of SYD would not tolerate a player going outside team first
A team that sets standards would not have played Murphy and Laird in every game they were available. All we're doing here is removing the last little bit of fun left in Rachele's game.This would have been a move by the Leadership group, not the Coach in isolation
Set standards …. Rachele fits into the team, not Rachele doing his own ****
I endorse the move …. Dawson isn’t a clown & his background of SYD would not tolerate a player going outside team first
Laird already did it a day before- the seeds were sown
https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/misa...rory-laird-after-showdown-comments-c-15761146
This would have been a move by the Leadership group, not the Coach in isolation
Set standards …. Rachele fits into the team, not Rachele doing his own ****
I endorse the move …. Dawson isn’t a clown & his background of SYD would not tolerate a player going outside team first
Absolutely joke, just wrong at every turn. Amazing he has the respect and confidence of anyone.
The club lacks strong leaders... On and off the fieldAre we talking the Leadership Group that includes Lachlan Murphy?
Of course you would endorse the move. **** me!
The club lacks strong leaders... On and off the field
If I saw nicks right now I’d flick his hat off no question
Kochie is a smart operator.Not always true. Port & Koch threw everything at an Abernethy win, but members wanted Tredrea.
Ultimately though, Tredrea, like the two elected Crows board members, has little power, as he’s hopelessly outnumbered. Any motion he puts up on behalf of members is easily voted down.
The two elected positions are, very obviously, token spots to give members a false sense of representation.
I agree with you that it won’t be a silver bullet but that isn’t a reason not to do it.
It’s almost certain that a board entirely accountable to members doesn’t get away with what they’ve done this year.
WTF...
And yet Murphy will stay in....
He will be.Yeh amazing isn’t it.
What I’ll find over the preseason is who will be in our leadership team next year. I’d be staggered if Murphy is in it.
He will be.
But shouldn't be.
Nicks loves him.
Think positive, if they sack nicks, Murphy's gold pass evaporates so it might be his last game in the seniorsWTF...
And yet Murphy will stay in....
Think positive, if they sack nicks, Murphy's gold pass evaporates so it might be his last game in the seniors
Someone on here posted ages ago that Nick's contract had clauses where they could terminate of he didn't make finals? anyone able to clarify if that was accurate? and if it is, they f**king well better be looking at the bottom 4 finish in year 5 of the rebuild.They won’t sack Nicks until mid next year when we are sitting in the bottom 6.
Made up BS.Someone on here posted ages ago that Nick's contract had clauses where they could terminate of he didn't make finals? anyone able to clarify if that was accurate? and if it is, they f**king well better be looking at the bottom 4 finish in year 5 of the rebuild.