I don’t have time to read all this
Read the first sentence about strong argument, noticed the size of the argument and correctly concluded strength would be severely lacking. If it’s a strong argument you have, a single paragraph will suffice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I don’t have time to read all this
Couple of issues with this.
1. We ended up being 2 wins and considerable percentage from making the finals in 2019. As a club we were on a steady decline from 15 wins in 2017 to 12 wins in 2018 to 10 wins in 2019.
2. We lost more than just Greenwood and Keath. We also lost Betts (21) and Atkins (20) who were best 22 in 2019. Plus losing vets that were a key part of our Grand Final team 2 years prior in (Jenkins , Jacobs, Douglas). These losses are cumulative - especially considering we had already lost Cameron, Lever and McGovern.
Nicks walked into one of the worst situations possible. Fractured playing group and a gutted list. The issue is that as a club we have not been publicly realistic about where we are at. I don't think Clarkson would have done anything with our list in 2020.
That being said - we are now 3 years into the Nicks experiment and I think it would be in everyones best interest to get rid of him this offseason.
Betts was cooked and Atkins we didn’t lose till end of the spoon year. Sauce and Dougie were cooked/retired, then not playing improved the 22. JJ the only player that might have made the 22 on output alone. Your names don’t make it a crash and burn set of list changes. More like moving on dead wood for an immediate uplift in impact. Had we kept Dsice, Dougie and Betts and played them, we’d have been worse.
Can't judge a coach that inherited a list that was 1 win from finals that lost Keath and Greenwood as best 22 players and then drove that group to the spoon. Are you serious? You can't just give him a mulligan for coaching us to a spoon after losing not a single player of note.
Betts was cooked and Atkins we didn’t lose till end of the spoon year. Sauce and Dougie were cooked/retired, then not playing improved the 22. JJ the only player that might have made the 22 on output alone. Your names don’t make it a crash and burn set of list changes. More like moving on dead wood for an immediate uplift in impact. Had we kept Dsice, Dougie and Betts and played them, we’d have been worse.
No current season stats available
No mention of full, deep rebuild anywhere, not even a hint
But here is Steven Trigg comparing Nicks to Brendan Bolton!!!
Too soon huh?
“
Former Adelaide and Carlton chief executive Steven Trigg said the Crows' coaching role was "an extraordinarily pressurised role" because of the focus in South Australia on the team.He was on panels that picked three of the Crows' coaches and one of Carlton's, Brendon Bolton in 2015."We [Carlton] needed a coach who could really teach, communicate and drive culture and I think that's probably what the Crows are looking for at the moment and if it's Matthew Nicks I'm sure that is the set of qualities they're looking for," he said ahead of the announcement.
the irony is that Nicks hasn’t been under pressure, he’s had a free ride
Even if we were planning a full, deep rebuild, would the club have ever admitted they were doing this?
The sooner people realise Nicks is taking the club nowhere the less frustrated they will be.So Nicks saw perhaps the best midfield performance we've had all year last week and thought "we need to change that"
I dunno, that sounds exactly like how we've operated historically
So if Dawson had missed or Murray had been called deliberate OOB Nicks would have a worse winning percentage than Primus, who was at a club in an even bigger state of disarray.
I'm out.
On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
At this point does anyone have any idea what his idea for building a premiership team is other than zany contract renewal announcements for players?
???
profit
Sometimes I wonder if you even read what you are responding to. You can disagree with it but the poster clearly outlined the rationale for 2023 being a reasonable timeline.That is blindly more time when it’s not based on anything
In fact that is the definition of blindly more time
Sometimes I wonder if you even read what you are responding to. You can disagree with it but the poster clearly outlined the rationale for 2023 being a reasonable timeline.
At this point does anyone have any idea what his idea for building a premiership team is other than zany contract renewal announcements for players?
???
profit