The King!
Chosen One
i think because mummy is such a big boy and abletts a little fella, it makes it look worse
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You are a tool. Crawl back under that rock you came from.
Shouldn't of been reported, no question but that isn't Garry's fault.
alas, no word of an appeal. I guess its not going happen. Damn, that does not seem right. Having trouble letting go of this.
Me too. I really am finding it difficult not just because it is us but because in general this is a bad "image". And also because of the obvious lack of fairness with the Hayes and the ROK tackles not being looked at even. I dont know I just feel like we have been harshly done by.
Well their not, why wasn't Hayes charged, he's another protected species but a great player.Very stiff on Mummy, I guess they will have to be consistent with that call from now on.
Club is appealing.. the said they would on FB?!
2 points:
1. Mummy (like Shaw before him) is finding out how umpires really treat the Swans. Fraud.
2. I disgaree that the tribunal is being inconsistent. Several players from other clubs did the same but worse - and no citing or suspension. A Swans player, however, is cited and suspended. That is absolutely consistent with how the Swans are treated in the VFL.