PS: I would completely deserve someone yelling that at me
I like you!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PS: I would completely deserve someone yelling that at me
I like you too XTreme. Group hug and heck the GianceI like you!!!
Why?
Although it would be a noble deed by Winmar - it was his reputation that they tarnished.
Dude, please.Because there is evidence Winmar did the gesture about having guts.
I havn't seen a bad thing written about Winmar since they made the comments.
Newman questioned Winmar's motives for no better reason than he's a confused old man who no longer understand the world around him. It wasn't an opinion it was simply not factually correct and said deliberately to impugn Winmar's reputation. If Newman thought he had leg to stand on legally you can guarantee his signature wouldn't have been on the apology.
But you can question someone's motives. It's not against the law to do so, regardless if you are a politician or not.There is a difference between political discussion that doesn't really infer anything more serious than pork barreling and airing a conspiracy theory standard rumour about how someone contorted the story of their actions to profit from the fact that they're a minority.
The forum it's expressed is also important. If you write it on a public toilet wall, it's a lot different to being published in a widely distributed and much respected newspaper.
But you can question someone's motives. It's not against the law to do so, regardless if you are a politician or not.
I'm not saying that they were correct, I am talking about the principle of having an opinion of someone's motives.
The same rules apply to politicians as it does any member of the public. If it was so easy to sue someone in an instance like this then any person who has been called a racist would be able to sue that person as well. Same if you were called sexist or bigot, or whatever. Call an umpire a cheat, you get sued. Say the players don't care or arnt trying, get sued.
There was never a legal case for Winmar, regardless of if they were wrong. You have the freedom to question anyone's motives.
What comments?Glad the apology has happened. Hopefully anyone following this case has learnt that those types of comments won't be tolerated.
Do you know him? You've called him a spineless troll. Why gives you the right to call him that but he can't say what he said (not that I agree with it)?I didn't think Newman would retract what he said so quickly. He really is nothing more than a spineless troll.
I’ve read and heard many times that Sams one of the most loyal and generous people there is. His media persona is a polar opposite from his personality.I recall reading something about newman or his family paying polly farmer wagez cos the cats were broke.also is it true that newman has sponsored an indigenous golf tournament in qld for many many years
You can't rewrite history and lie about it, that's not freedom of speech.
He wa$ banking on a pay day.Winmar is extremely sensitive for a bloke convicted of assaulting a cab driver.
I understand he wants the record set straight, but this is merely a few blokes giving their OPINION on a podcast.
Surely he has better things to do.
Winmar is extremely sensitive for a bloke convicted of assaulting a cab driver.
I understand he wants the record set straight, but this is merely a few blokes giving their OPINION on a podcast.
Google:Does anyone know the outcome of winmar’s court case with the taxi driver?
If anyone ever doubts that Newman is a racist piece of sh*t - watch this. It's a special segment on the Footy Show designed to discuss and highlight the racism Chris Lewis was subjected to during his AFL career and the impact it had on him. Dermot Brereton acknowledges that Hawthorne targeted him with Racism, and apologises for it. Dermott comes across OK. He says he was uneducated and did the wrong thing.
Newman actually says to Brereton that there was nothing in it and it was just "gamesmanship"...........During a segment discussing the impact of racist comments.....to the person that says they did the wrong thing.....in front of the person that was racially abused.....on national TV.
And it is his only contribution in the whole 15-minute segment.
How this racist idiot was given so many years on television speaks volumes to the general public.
6:40 is where he starts, but you need to watch the full video to see how out of place his racist comments are.
He wa$ banking on a pay day.
Does anyone know the outcome of winmar’s court case with the taxi driver?
Didn't it get donated to the Michael Long Foundation?
Or do you just enjoy being a keyboard warrior?