- Jun 21, 2014
- 9,330
- 10,428
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Cripps did a bit of rucking on the weekend.Cripps is taller than Wayne Carey and Tony Lockett, who were the same height as Polly Farmer.
On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Cripps did a bit of rucking on the weekend.Cripps is taller than Wayne Carey and Tony Lockett, who were the same height as Polly Farmer.
On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Dermott would be the size of the tall mids today.Cripps is taller than Wayne Carey and Tony Lockett, who were the same height as Polly Farmer.
On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
He wasn't a ruckman, he was a ruck-rover, big difference.Kerls had a fierce determination about him like none you’ve ever seen. He epitomized everything about the old blood ‘n’ guts style of footy.
In a sign of how the game has changed over the years, he was the boundary rider for AFL games in the early days of the Crows. One night he interviewed Daryl Hart, who was a Crows assistant coach at the time. They were both the same height. Hart had been a rover, Kerls had been a ruckman.
F**k that, same with Stengle.No wonder we let Cameron go. Kicks too many goals for a small forward.
On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
We didn't really have a choice did we? He wanted to go to Brisbane.No wonder we let Cameron go. Kicks too many goals for a small forward.
On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Tall mid by Hamish Ogilvie's standard.Dermott would be the size of the tall mids today.
Yeah we did. Give him the money he wanted and is worth.We didn't really have a choice did we? He wanted to go to Brisbane.
Look it made sense to sign on for a longer term an aging Eddie than have a younger exciting small forward with so much more potential.
Hmm, we really don't like small forwards who can kick goals do we?
What?Do you go back that far?
That's GROTTO in the blazer in the front of the photoDo you go back that far?
What I find amazing about his career was the amount of times he changed club as a player and as a coach.
Just a few people there!
Pretty certain that even after winning flags with South and Westies in the 60s, he had conflicts with management and that was the main reason for leaving.What I find amazing about his career was the amount of times he changed club as a player and as a coach.
Back in those days, loyalty to a club was a big thing.
I reckon it would have taken a lot of courage to do that back then. It was widely frowned upon changing clubs.
He wasn't a ruckman, he was a ruck-rover, big difference.
Genuine question, and I think the answer might be different today than it was 6 weeks ago, but would people prefer Cameron or Fog going forward?Look it made sense to sign on for a longer term an aging Eddie than have a younger exciting small forward with so much more potential.
You dont need them.
Charlie Cameron was contracted too from memory
Genuine question, and I think the answer might be different today than it was 6 weeks ago, but would people prefer Cameron or Fog going forward?
We would never have had both.
On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Exactly what I was thinking. I suppose it's because he's elite up forward and lycett is already an elite ruckman.Why doesn’t he play him there then?
The other factor was managing a tight salary cap at that point.Charlie is an elite small forward, so you would take him over Fogarty.
The question is a bit more complicated as had we had him in 2018,19 he may have helped us break into the 8. However, is a need for now?
Charlie is 27 and Fogarty 22.
With Fogarty there is the assumption that his trajectory suggests he could become a good forward for us, when we are potentially competing for a flag in 5+ years time.
The easy answer is to take Charlie as he is 100% known quantity that is elite. But he probably has another 4-5 years left only in him.