Maybe Champion data got it wrong sayingExactly what I was thinking. I suppose it's because he's elite up forward and lycett is already an elite ruckman.
Sent from my MI PAD 4 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Maybe Champion data got it wrong sayingExactly what I was thinking. I suppose it's because he's elite up forward and lycett is already an elite ruckman.
Sent from my MI PAD 4 using Tapatalk
Look, don't let facts get in the way ok?The other factor was managing a tight salary cap at that point.
Not to mention his brother Karl as well...that's 3!Maybe Champion data got it wrong saying Carl Amon is Port's only elite player. They obviously didn't know Charlie was an elite ruckman.
Genuine question, and I think the answer might be different today than it was 6 weeks ago, but would people prefer Cameron or Fog going forward?
We would never have had both.
On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Wowee. That's a bit of a shocker. Can't just pick it up and walk over. Can only assume the ump thought it was already over which is also pretty bad.
Surely as a player you just hang back half a step on that.
I'm not actually sure what the problem with the deliberate rushing it through part is. You already get penalised with a point to the other team, maybe make it 2 points which would reduce the likelihood of it, but is it really the biggest issue in the game?I thought they tweaked that rule back so if the player was within 9m of the goal they could just knock it through, the "under pressure " component was removed?
He sort of gathered/pick it up right on the line so he didn't even take one step with it after he picked it up, maybe thats why he wasn't pinged for "just walking it over"
Probably wrong as the commentators still bang on about the pressure part.
I think the rule was brought in as a knee jerk reaction to Hawthorn's tactics in the 2008 grand finalI'm not actually sure what the problem with the deliberate rushing it through part is. You already get penalised with a point to the other team, maybe make it 2 points which would reduce the likelihood of it, but is it really the biggest issue in the game?
I think players diving, dropping their knees and throwing their heads back is a bigger issue in terms of the look of the game.
I think the rule was brought in as a knee jerk reaction to Hawthorn's tactics in the 2008 grand final
I believe the rule is thatI thought they tweaked that rule back so if the player was within 9m of the goal they could just knock it through, the "under pressure " component was removed?
It was the kind of move that players make on the boundary line all the time - gather ball right on / near the line, keep running, whoops, went out of play, no deliberate free. Except he was pretty much standing still, the ball had stopped on the line, and he had every opportunity to turn around and move forward, it's not like there was momentum pushing him & the ball towards the line.He sort of gathered/pick it up right on the line so he didn't even take one step with it after he picked it up, maybe thats why he wasn't pinged for "just walking it over"
I've always felt the rushed behind is so easy to fix.I think the rule was brought in as a knee jerk reaction to Hawthorn's tactics in the 2008 grand final