Opinion Non-Crows AFL 5: Save Ken

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

As soon as I saw the "Carlton can win the flag" segments doing the rounds this week I switched my tip to the Saints.
I picked the Saints on the rebound theory after a bad loss last week & useful ins.

Didnt see any of the game as have been wine tasting tonight... but can't believe in both of my footy comps, I was the only one to pick the Saints... & gone to top in 1 comp.

Now watching the last quarter replay.
 
Just having a look at the fixture it looks likely you will need 13 wins to make the 8.

Collingwood and Richmond are in the box seat to win at least 12 games and that doesn’t include their games against Port.

Port ain’t going to make it.

Yeah I reckon the Saints winning has made it even harder for Port. If they lose tomorrow they're 3 games + a bit of percentage out of the 8.
 
Yeah I reckon the Saints winning has made it even harder for Port. If they lose tomorrow they're 3 games + a bit of percentage out of the 8.
I just want it to all come down to the showdown.
It will be good experience for our squad to play in a "finals" atmosphere.

Don't want any showdown being a dead rubber.
 
I believe the rule is that
  • If it's outside 9m, you can't do it at all. Pressure is not an excuse.
  • If it's inside 9m, you can do it, but only if "under pressure"
You don't get a free pass for being inside 9m.

It was the kind of move that players make on the boundary line all the time - gather ball right on / near the line, keep running, whoops, went out of play, no deliberate free. Except he was pretty much standing still, the ball had stopped on the line, and he had every opportunity to turn around and move forward, it's not like there was momentum pushing him & the ball towards the line.

I was inclined to give the umpires a pass because it was so "line ball" but... I guess you've got to see the replay to see how obvious it was. In real time, I guess the umpire's going "yeah nah, not paying that". It would almost be one of those "guesses" that we hate umpires making.

Edit: Here is the rule:


18.11 DELIBERATE RUSHED BEHINDS
18.11.1 Spirit and Intention Players shall be encouraged to keep the football in play.
18.11.2 Free Kicks - Deliberate Rushed Behinds A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player from the Defending Team who intentionally Kicks, Handballs or forces the football over the Attacking Team’s Goal Line or Behind Line or onto one of the Attacking Team’s Goal Posts, and the Player:
(a) is greater than nine metres from the Goal Line or Behind Line;
(b) is not under immediate physical pressure;
(c) has had time and space to dispose of the football; or
(d) from a Ruck contest, hits the football over the Goal Line or Behind Line on the full.

- I think there should be an "or" after each of the points a, b, and c.

There absolutely should be, how can an organisation like the AFL make such an obvious omission. **** they're dumb.
 
Jake Kelly just kicked a goal lol.
 
All this time he has been played out of position... ;)

Sounds like the wheels falling off for Sydney.
Swans have been terribly selfish around goals. Taking shots from low percentage spots instead of passing.

They should still be 3 goals up though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top