So has anyone read a quote from an Indigenous player saying they are 100% behind either of Clarkson or Fagan?
It would be strange if anyone said that given that no one knows the full story
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
So has anyone read a quote from an Indigenous player saying they are 100% behind either of Clarkson or Fagan?
No current season stats available
That’ll take him longer than the time he spent in the fire brigadeI know we poke fun at Kane Cornes and he can be a real ****head at times, but to run from Adelaide to Melbourne in support of kids who are struggling is a sensational effort.
What about Dijonnaise
Given Gils very close social relationship with Clarkson, surely he can't hang around just to make sure his mate is cleared....
That wouldn't be like the AFL boys club
There you go, nothing to see here. No way any malarkey could happen then.Gil’s very clearly not on the investigation panel.
There you go, nothing to see here. No way any malarkey could happen then.
That's great news
Externally appointed panel. For once I have confidence that it won’t be swept under the rug.There you go, nothing to see here. No way any malarkey could happen then.
That's great news
Interesting he speaks about additional things in the Hawthorn report which align with what came out in the ABC article.Happy to help
‘Clearly it’s difficult’: Months-long Hawks racism probe looms as AFL boss wants coaches heard
‘Clearly it’s difficult’: Months-long Hawks racism probe looms as AFL boss wants coaches heardwww.foxsports.com.au
I think for balance, its good to look at the Hawthorn thread, Main Forum and on our board.I’m pleasantly surprised the thread on the Hawthorn board is far more informed and balanced - not to mention accepting - than a lot of what is being posted here. FYI for anyone interested.
No, the Hawthorn board is far more accepting of the accusers than elsewhere, particularly now it's been noted an assistant coach corroborated at least some of the complaints. There's no persecution complex over there. It's refreshing.I think for balance, its good to look at the Hawthorn thread, Main Forum and on our board.
You get an opinion with a potential bias, the opinion of general public and the opinion amongst Crows supporters.
I think generally speaking the opinions are the same. Only real bias I noticed was on the North board, where you can clearly understand why they would be potentially biased. It definitely would setback their rebuild a couple of years conservatively.
So/ just continuing on the devils advocate path, is Eddie assuming racism where it actually didn’t exist then ?I think the lady saying that Eddie and his kid made them feel uncomfortable is highly unlikely to be because of his skin colour. Eddie has assumed that, but I doubt it would be correct. But I understand why he'd jump to that conclusion too.
No. You didnt read my post properly, I said its good to get a cross section from everyone. Its great that the Hawks posters are like that, but regardless there is an inherent bias as this is their Club.No, the Hawthorn board is far more accepting of the accusers than elsewhere, particularly now it's been noted an assistant coach corroborated at least some of the complaints. There's no persecution complex over there. It's refreshing.
So/ just continuing on the devils advocate path, is Eddie assuming racism where it actually didn’t exist then ?
I did. If there is an inherent bias on the Hawks board, you would assume it's to protect their own, which isn't the case.No. You didnt read my post properly, I said its good to get a cross section from everyone. Its great that the Hawks posters are like that, but regardless there is an inherent bias as this is their Club.
Reading neutral supporters thoughts on this, gives also another difference in opinion as well. It culminates in an overall balance.
As far as I am aware, The Crows have been a very proactive club when it comes to indigenous players. In recent years we had issues but that was on the back of the camp. But the Crows have long had indigenous programs and McLeod was a driving force for continued improvement. This of course doesn't make things ok. A good club should always review and reflect upon past policies and processes with the goal to improve in all areas.Club statement from Dale Alcock… Club statement from Dale Alcock
Fremantle have announced they are going to do a review too. Good to see a club getting on the front foot here and realising every club will have to do one pretty soon.
With Freo and Sydney announcing one, and the expectation that they will happen league-wide, I feel bad about dreading our review.
I want to believe we've been fair to all past players, but there's not a lot from the club to give me any confidence.
Interesting he speaks about additional things in the Hawthorn report which align with what came out in the ABC article.
“I need to be careful, it’s a confidential report. There was actually more in the papers yesterday, more substantive stuff, than was in the report in many senses.
“But there’s also some additional pieces in the report that haven’t come out. The flavour of what you read represents accurately the flavour of what’s in the report, if that makes sense.”
No, haven't heard anything (beyond camp stuff), but frankly recently the club has a habit of disappointing. Maybe it's me, maybe the media pile-on, maybe justified.Why? Have you heard something that leads you to believe that we have historically treated our indigenous players poorly?
I suspect we will have one of the easiest reviews out of all the clubs considering all the s**t that has come out about us already. Quick re-hash -> Done.