Mega Thread Non-Freo AFL Discussion 2023

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Logue is no replacement for Chapman. Wilson would be first up I reckon.
Nah imo Wilson is a rebounding defender so he would replace Clark or Walker. Chapman has height and speed which makes him a versatile defender. This is why I think Logue is a good replacement for him.
 
Nah imo Wilson is a rebounding defender so he would replace Clark or Walker. Chapman has height and speed which makes him a versatile defender. This is why I think Logue is a good replacement for him.
Agree that Wilson would cover Clark, walker and potentially even Young (with a shuffle of other players).
Hamling is backup for all of Pearce, Cox and Chapman. He can play on 3rd tall or medium Forwards.
 
I think you guys are significantly undervaluing the rebound Chapman provides which they love him for as much as his height. If we didnt play an athletic Logue unless no other choice with Ryan, Pearce and Cox then I dont see how Hamling gets in there. I'd bet my house they play Wilson to cover Chappy (and shuffle other magnets around) rather than Hamling
 
It's ******* hilarious (and sad) reading North's board jump through circus hoops to get behind him. Copium is a helluva drug
been even sadder on twitter, hysterical stuff
 
I think you guys are significantly undervaluing the rebound Chapman provides which they love him for as much as his height. If we didnt play an athletic Logue unless no other choice with Ryan, Pearce and Cox then I dont see how Hamling gets in there. I'd bet my house they play Wilson to cover Chappy (and shuffle other magnets around) rather than Hamling

It depends if Chapman was going to play a negating role or more attacking. Wilson could come in for the latter scenario, but they could also go to Hughes for a defensive role. Agree it would not be Hamling, he is only cover for Pearce/Cox.

Chapman is so valuable because he covers all the good things about Logue, Wilson, Hughes, without their negative attributes. The only thing he would lack is raw strength compared with Logue, but that will come.
 
It depends if Chapman was going to play a negating role or more attacking. Wilson could come in for the latter scenario, but they could also go to Hughes for a defensive role. Agree it would not be Hamling, he is only cover for Pearce/Cox.

Chapman is so valuable because he covers all the good things about Logue, Wilson, Hughes, without their negative attributes. The only thing he would lack is raw strength compared with Logue, but that will come.
They could go Hamling for Ryan if he was out because he basically plays as a KPD who can kick it really long these days and Hughes is a good one, I agree they'd bring him in before Hamling for Chapman
 
Nah imo Wilson is a rebounding defender so he would replace Clark or Walker. Chapman has height and speed which makes him a versatile defender. This is why I think Logue is a good replacement for him.
No chance. Who came in for Chapman last year?

We had many opportunities to play Peace, Cox and Logue and almost never did it. Chapman not playing wouldn't change that.

Wilson or maybe Hughes.
 
Could play small and get more exposure to someone like Worner, Davies or Draper

Logical would be Wagner, Hughes, Wilson or Aish


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Oh my. Perspective is a weird thing. Perspective is everything. Despite yesterday's 'shambles'....it's always best to not look too far ahead

 
Dirty Birds win one meaningless pre-season game - Immediately labelled "improved" LOL
those silly tossers called 'journalists' gotta try and get paid for something. How else they gunna drum up "excitement" for the upcoming season....hopium still sells tickets.....I'll reserve judgement on any AFL team until the real deal kicks in. Until then, it's all just gumph, bum-fluff and tossy flossy with Ross the bossy! :p:laughv1:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top