Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
As you may have seen last night, this was one of the big questions posed. What would your answer be?
100%. If your inside 50’s aren’t happening then why bother with elite KPF’s. This poses another question. Can a team with elite KPD’s, average mids and rubbish KPF’s ever scrape into the eight? Kind of reminds me of my teamDepends on how good your midfield is. If your midfield is crap, two elite key backs, if your midfield is average to above average, two elite key forwards.
100%. If your inside 50’s aren’t happening then why bother with elite KPF’s. This poses another question. Can a team with elite KPD’s, average mids and rubbish KPF’s ever scrape into the eight? Kind of reminds me of my team
That's an easy one. Take the two elite KPF's every day of the week.
Talls can be taught how to defend to a dependable standard and the rules (as they are currently applied) assist defenders. But you can't teach true "forward craft" that's innate and they lead their defenders to the ball.
Look at all the "dynasty Premiers" and they always have two (or more) GUN forwards.
Well as a Hawthorn supporter it's pretty easy. Based on our previous success I go with KPF.
Good defence also sets up forward attacksGood D is so good tho.
Defence that is, very important in modern football.
Collingwood, Dees, two recent premiers with average KPF. Nice small and not so smalls fwiw tho: Kozzie, Hill, Elliot, Fritsch.
What would our mate Ross Lyon want? lolGood defence also sets up forward attacks
Geelong under Malcolm Blight had 2 elite forwards - Ablett and Brownless (3 if you included Stoneham), but couldn’t win a premiership because its defence was average.
Under Bomber Thompson Cats had 2 elite back men - Scarlett & Egan / Taylor, and a forward line led by Cam Mooney. Won 2 premierships.
Therefore - key backs are the key IMO
I knowFootball is very different today, defence largely relies on forward and midfield pressure and zone structure, not one-on-one defending.
Geelong circa 2010 also had a little more going for it than a couple of elite defenders.
Not as simple as that, they would be serviceable but backs cant grab and wrestle as much as forwards, they cant use the lead as much and they have too watch a man or a space, totally different mindset required.It has to be elite KPFs. I mean it’s quite obvious that guys like Curnow, Cameron, Hogan and Naughton would be star backman if their side needed it anyway.
Not as simple as that, they would be serviceable but backs cant grab and wrestle as much as forwards, they cant use the lead as much and they have too watch a man or a space, totally different mindset required.
I think the numbers would be similar as to those going back or forward, there have been a few successes both ways, I think you're under estimating the skills required as a backman when you say those players could go back and be top level in 3 or 4 games, as a backman you stand under a lot of packs, as a forward you are that pack.How often do we see a struggling forward prospect switch back and flourish. Now compare that to how often a struggling back prospect switches forward and succeeds.
Its far easier to play back. Obviously there are skills that are better suited to each end but at the end of the day I'm extremely confident that the guys I listed would become top level defenders after 3 or 4 games