- Jul 14, 2012
- 8,886
- 14,572
- AFL Club
- Carlton
What's with people wishing injuries on others today? It's pretty disgusting.
Its called a joke
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's with people wishing injuries on others today? It's pretty disgusting.
Its called a joke
I thought jokes were meant to be funny. I don't see the humour in hoping someone else gets hurt, and I'm sure we'd all be offended if someone wished it on one of our boys.Its called a joke
I thought jokes were meant to be funny. I don't see the humour in hoping someone else gets hurt, and I'm sure we'd all be offended if someone wished it on one of our boys.
I'm stumped. I must have missed something.
I'd like to know which rule enables Mumford to arrange a move to GWS without it being trade week, without him having been delisted, and without him being a FA.
Anyone got something for me?
And please, the AFL's rule of "We'll allow anything to ensure success in Sydney" isn't an actual rule, despite how obvious it has become in reality.
I'm stumped. I must have missed something.
I'd like to know which rule enables Mumford to arrange a move to GWS without it being trade week, without him having been delisted, and without him being a FA.
Anyone got something for me?
And please, the AFL's rule of "We'll allow anything to ensure success in Sydney" isn't an actual rule, despite how obvious it has become in reality.
they did it with davis mid season '11
I'm stumped. I must have missed something.
I'd like to know which rule enables Mumford to arrange a move to GWS without it being trade week, without him having been delisted, and without him being a FA.
Anyone got something for me?
And please, the AFL's rule of "We'll allow anything to ensure success in Sydney" isn't an actual rule, despite how obvious it has become in reality.
maybe it's all the bigfooty cynics getting to me but I get the feeling we overrate Laids and Duigan's trade value
I'm stumped. I must have missed something.
I'd like to know which rule enables Mumford to arrange a move to GWS without it being trade week, without him having been delisted, and without him being a FA.
Anyone got something for me?
And please, the AFL's rule of "We'll allow anything to ensure success in Sydney" isn't an actual rule, despite how obvious it has become in reality.
Gotta love opposition boards thinking we are gonna Trade Yarran and our first rounder for WCE first rounder...
Read on the Essendon board a deal that involved Crameri + steak knives for Bulldogs pick 4
Read on the Essendon board a deal that involved Crameri + steak knives for Bulldogs pick 4
heck - is he THAT good a prospect??Yep, thats it ^
maybe it's all the bigfooty cynics getting to me but I get the feeling we overrate Laids and Duigan's trade value
If Betts leaves and Thomas comes to Carlton we lose our compensation pick. It's a win/loss scenario.
In the case that Betts is firm on leaving Victoria and wants to move to Adelaide for personal reasons, wouldn't Carlton want to match Adelaide's offer. This is not to retain Betts but rather get at least something for him. Adelaide would be forced to cough up a player like McKay or McKernan or a draft pick to acquire Betts. In effect we could at least get some value from Betts and get Thomas for nothing.
Off season is only 4 days old and stick a fork in me I'm almost cooked.
Off season is only 4 days old and stick a fork in me I'm almost cooked.