List Mgmt. Our Trade/FA, Suburban & Country Town Thread

[Jen2310]

Correct me if I’m wrong here, but my understanding is that our current senior list has 33 on it after the delistings of AJ and Markov?

Thats right

 

[Mick F]

So going by all experts we have good 2025 and Maybe 2026 but after that we be a Bottom 4 Side?

Depends on the number of quality under 25 players you consider we currently have on the books.

 

[Pragmatic Shill]

Correct me if I’m wrong here, but my understanding is that our current senior list has 33 on it after the delistings of AJ and Markov?

No correction required.

 

[sr36]

I've just been told that even though we've committed to AJ and Markov, right now and up until the rookie draft itself they aren't on our list. So for all intents and purposes, we have extra spots for the senior list technically (we just won't use them).

You're right. That's good. We do get to keep 66. As we technically have 5 vacancies.

 

[Scodog10]

Thats right

No correction required.

That seems to me to be 5 ND picks even though we all know we’ll be taking 3. Essentially there’s nothing stopping us from drafting both AJ and Markov in the ND on top of the three live picks aside from stupidity.

 

[JuniorB]

That seems to me to be 5 ND picks even though we all know we’ll be taking 3. Essentially there’s nothing stopping us from drafting both AJ and Markov in the ND on top of the three live picks aside from stupidity.

If they have even nominated for the ND, and if I'm correct, we'd have to give them a 2 year contract.
I'm not sure if that's the case if we redraft them in the rookie draft.
I don't think we'd want to offer either of them another 2 years.
Can someone enlighten me?

 

[Jen2310]

If they have even nominated for the ND, and if I'm correct, we'd have to give them a 2 year contract.
I'm not sure if that's the case if we redraft them in the rookie draft.
I don't think we'd want to offer either of them another 2 years.
Can someone enlighten me?

Yes they have nominated. They have to be eligible for the rookie draft. But the club said they'll select them in the rookie draft if they are available.
Can't imagine a senario where they would draft them in ND. But in terms of contracts. Its not the first time late picks have gotten 1 year.

 

[sr36]

If they have even nominated for the ND, and if I'm correct, we'd have to give them a 2 year contract.
I'm not sure if that's the case if we redraft them in the rookie draft.
I don't think we'd want to offer either of them another 2 years.
Can someone enlighten me?

It's inclyde all their salary in the salary cap. Not happening.

 

[Pragmatic Shill]

If they have even nominated for the ND, and if I'm correct, we'd have to give them a 2 year contract.
I'm not sure if that's the case if we redraft them in the rookie draft.
I don't think we'd want to offer either of them another 2 years.
Can someone enlighten me?

It's beside the point, Scodog was being facetious. The point is that on the National Draft nights, Markov and Johnson are not officially on our list. Yes we have made a commitment to them in the Rookie Draft, and we will honour that commitment, but it's about maintaining flexibility to have more than 3 draft picks so that we can do pick trades that could be advantageous to us.

 

[Forethought]

It's beside the point, Scodog was being facetious. The point is that on the National Draft nights, Markov and Johnson are not officially on our list. Yes we have made a commitment to them in the Rookie Draft, and we will honour that commitment, but it's about maintaining flexibility to have more than 3 draft picks so that we can do pick trades that could be advantageous to us.

Exactly. We have 33 senior list and can have up to 38 or 5 picks in the ND.
We currently have 4 cat A rookies and 1x cat b rookie .
Maximum 44 players on your list.
We can take 5 picks to the ND and don’t have to use them. This giving us flexibility to do trades live in the ND.
Currently we are only taking 4 to the ND so we can add one on the night live. Noting this will be done around bid matching and opportunity.
I’d say we are looking at trading 52/56 for a pick in the early 40’s, thus leaving us back with 3 picks in the ND.

Currently we have capacity in the ND and RD to add 6 players. With 2 of those being Rookie promises for Markov / AJ . That leaves 4 spots with a mix of at least 3 having to be ND

 

[Pragmatic Shill]

Exactly. We have 33 senior list and can have up to 38 or 5 picks in the ND.
We currently have 4 cat A rookies and 1x cat b rookie .
Maximum 44 players on your list.
We can take 5 picks to the ND and don’t have to use them. This giving us flexibility to do trades live in the ND.
Currently we are only taking 4 to the ND so we can add one on the night live. Noting this will be done around bid matching and opportunity.
I’d say we are looking at trading 52/56 for a pick in the early 40’s, thus leaving us back with 3 picks in the ND.

Currently we have capacity in the ND and RD to add 6 players. With 2 of those being Rookie promises for Markov / AJ . That leaves 4 spots with a mix of at least 3 having to be ND

For all intents and purposes the spare Cat B spot doesn't really matter in this case.

 

[sr36]

It's beside the point, Scodog was being facetious. The point is that on the National Draft nights, Markov and Johnson are not officially on our list. Yes we have made a commitment to them in the Rookie Draft, and we will honour that commitment, but it's about maintaining flexibility to have more than 3 draft picks so that we can do pick trades that could be advantageous to us.

It's really about salary cap. This is an added bonus - if we do manage to trade up in the draft.