Pakistan vs West Indies (2 tests)

Remove this Banner Ad

And windies batsmen struggle against reasonable spinners - which Pakistan have (they aren’t exceptional but they’re capable) on tracks which just offer a normal level of help. As was on display against Bangladesh a few months ago.

Additionally, Warrican and Motie, while far from mugs, wouldn’t pose an especially big danger to Pakistan on said normal spinning tracks. I would be amazed to see either of them collect 5 in an innings for less than say, 80, on a standard subcontinental deck.
Yep. Plus Windies is a bizarre batting line up - pretty much the entire team averages in the 20s. Braithwaite is the only one likely to get in and milk the bowlers on a good pitch, but they're all more than capable of chipping in handy runs. And a pitch like this, no one gets in, so it diminishes the weakness of their batting line up and makes it all about how many blokes can chip in handy runs.
 
There's something absolutely hilarious about the commentator's attitude towards the advertising they have to do in the coverage. Just a wry, "I have to do this" sort of thing, a mild, half-hearted attempt at vamping on the subject of laundry powder or the coverage's favourite phone.

And just like that, it's over.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

As bad as we are capable of being - and believe me I’m not blind to it despite my always present optimism, the thing about a multi tiered structure to test cricket that pisses me off is this:

If, hypothetically, Sri Lanka and Pakistan were to go into a tier with England, Australia, South Africa, NZ and India, that means three sides we beat regularly are playing in a ‘league’ we can’t be a part of (Sri Lanka, Pakistan and England). Sri Lanka, Pakistan and England frequently lose when they tour the Caribbean either in matches or series, we have won test matches in England in two of our last 3 tours there, if we win tomorrow in Pakistan it will mean by my count we’ve won matches in two of our last three away series against them as well, including the UAE. We were only 40 runs off a series win over South Africa last year, too, though we haven’t beaten them in a test match for donkey’s years.

You can now as of last year add a drawn series with Australia to that list, unlikely as it may be that we would square another series with them in Australia; but who knows, on our home deck later in the year we may sneak a test.

That’s just a West Indies aspect. Bangladesh have just as many gripes given some of their results, too.

Yes you want consistently competitive cricket.

But that has never existed. There has never been a time where season after season, series after series, every team that comes up against every other team has been evenly matched and producing the highest standard of cricket imaginable. People nostalgically think there was, but there wasn’t. There were a few periods where there were 3-4 decent sides but they weren’t playing each other every other week. And often when they did, it was a let down.

What is good is letting teams play one another and hoping for what has ALWAYS provided cricket lovers with fascination and great entertainment - matches like the Gabba last summer or Headingley during the Hope/Brathwaite test or the recent SA one wicket win or the Perera test where something completely out of the blue happens and you go ‘what the f**k was that!!!!’ And you remember why you love test cricket beyond just the series that you automatically dial yourself in for on autopilot like The Ashes or the BG Trophy etc - which by all means have their place but will always be there
 
As bad as we are capable of being - and believe me I’m not blind to it despite my always present optimism, the thing about a multi tiered structure to test cricket that pisses me off is this:

If, hypothetically, Sri Lanka and Pakistan were to go into a tier with England, Australia, South Africa, NZ and India, that means three sides we beat regularly are playing in a ‘league’ we can’t be a part of (Sri Lanka, Pakistan and England). Sri Lanka, Pakistan and England frequently lose when they tour the Caribbean either in matches or series, we have won test matches in England in two of our last 3 tours there, if we win tomorrow in Pakistan it will mean by my count we’ve won matches in two of our last three away series against them as well, including the UAE. We were only 40 runs off a series win over South Africa last year, too, though we haven’t beaten them in a test match for donkey’s years.

You can now as of last year add a drawn series with Australia to that list, unlikely as it may be that we would square another series with them in Australia; but who knows, on our home deck later in the year we may sneak a test.

That’s just a West Indies aspect. Bangladesh have just as many gripes given some of their results, too.

Yes you want consistently competitive cricket.

But that has never existed. There has never been a time where season after season, series after series, every team that comes up against every other team has been evenly matched and producing the highest standard of cricket imaginable. People nostalgically think there was, but there wasn’t. There were a few periods where there were 3-4 decent sides but they weren’t playing each other every other week. And often when they did, it was a let down.

What is good is letting teams play one another and hoping for what has ALWAYS provided cricket lovers with fascination and great entertainment - matches like the Gabba last summer or Headingley during the Hope/Brathwaite test or the recent SA one wicket win or the Perera test where something completely out of the blue happens and you go ‘what the f**k was that!!!!’ And you remember why you love test cricket beyond just the series that you automatically dial yourself in for on autopilot like The Ashes or the BG Trophy etc - which by all means have their place but will always be there

Plus it's all cycles. Personally, I think if Windies can keep their bowlers fit and playing test cricket, they're just a couple of quality batters away from becoming a really solid team again. Bowling looks like becoming strong. Kiwis who are currently strong are never far away from being pedestrian. Pakistan are perpetually on the verge of being awesome or awful.

You don't want to have teams like that fall into a pool that rarely plays test cricket. It's a fast track to them collapsing as test playing nations/regions.
 
****ing jaffa from Warrican!

A setup worthy of Herath; last two back a length outside off, big slow ripping balls to drag his foot across; flat, straight quicker one that doesn't spin to go through the checked drive on the yorker, drifting in ever so slightly.
Can genuinely bowl, I'd be interested to know how he'd go away from spinning conditions.
 
****ing jaffa from Warrican!

A setup worthy of Herath; last two back a length outside off, big slow ripping balls to drag his foot across; flat, straight quicker one that doesn't spin to go through the checked drive on the yorker, drifting in ever so slightly.
Can genuinely bowl, I'd be interested to know how he'd go away from spinning conditions.

He’s not shown a lot in his career to date, to be honest. Reliable but unremarkable
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Pakistan vs West Indies (2 tests)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top