Port Adelaide lose by 3 points after a wrong Goal Review against the Crows in the dying stages

[W.C. Fry]

It clearly passed in front of the post, went through for a point never mind if it hit the post or not. Do you have HD Foxtel or standard? It can be pretty hard to tell if it's not in HD.

HD. Actually was going to give up fox this year, had on hold during summer. 2 games of 7 SD into round 1 and I was on the phone getting it back on.

 

[beta_condition]

LOL at the people saying it went behind the post, you clearly see the shadow on the post. There's no way you can tell from those camera angles if touched the post or not, hence umpire call.

 

[Scorpus]

Here is that other angle where the ball went on the goal side of the post

Not sure how the other vision shows the ball in front of the post

 

[Paul Kersey]

Don't worry Marghetts, you won't be alone in the umpires' review this week.

No big finals for either of the cheats.

 

[Doashuey]

You may need to zoom is more because it definitely passed in front of the post. Probably clipped it though.

Yes it did. Ball moving from right to left and in front of the left hand goal.post. Point. Watch it again, had to pass behind the goal post to be a goal.

 

[tugga]

Blame Wines for trying an around-the-body shot at goal (or whatever the **** it's called) when a drop punt from 30 metres out would have done.
Stupid mistakes like that cost them the game. Not the video review (although that is a sack of shit as well).

 

[Orange Agent]

Considering JJ's social media work I think he is baiting and with it being Showdown and all the ramifications for Port he has his ultimate audience.

Well done to those that swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

 

[Cobbler]

Some hear Laurel others hear Yanni, but yeah that smashed the post based on nothing other than Jenkins reaction.

If it was a Poker game I’d have called Jenkins instantly.

 

[Cosmic Energy]

The picture you posted showed the ball moving from left to right of screen in front of the goal post, doesn't it?

It was moving from right to left as he had hooked it around his body. Looks a clear behind to me, probably also hitting the post.

 

[PowerForGood]

Blame Wines for trying an around-the-body shot at goal (or whatever the **** it's called) when a drop punt from 30 metres out would have done.
Stupid mistakes like that cost them the game. Not the video review (although that is a sack of shit as well).

I know you are just stirring.
Nothing makes up for an abysmal decision from an anonymous official.
Why shouldn't Port Adelaide win despite our mistakes? We were in front despite them. And then a decision like this - not a momentary umpiring mistake but a considered decision by an official who had all the time in the world to get it right, hell that is his JOB - changes the game and the season for a whole lot of teams.

 

[maskmcgee]

If you think that, I suggest that much like the AFL, you need to upgrade your tv screen. Goal review ump either uses the force to make decisions, or they are using a ten year old 19" computer monitor to do the goal reviews on.

Then how do you explain this?

 

[PowerForGood]

Considering JJ's social media work I think he is baiting and with it being Showdown and all the ramifications for Port he has his ultimate audience.

Well done to those that swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

So when he says "post" to his teammate on the field 5 seconds after the kick, you think he was thinking Twitter?

 

[tugga]

I know you are just stirring.
Nothing makes up for an abysmal decision from an anonymous official.
Why shouldn't Port Adelaide win despite our mistakes? We were in front despite them. And then a decision like this - not a momentary umpiring mistake but a considered decision by an official who had all the time in the world to get it right, hell that is his JOB - changes the game and the season for a whole lot of teams.

Half stirring. I'd be livid with Wines if I was you though.
Amateurs at the AFL. You'd be better off with tarot cards deciding on goal reviews. It stinks.

 

[ShanDog]

Then how do you explain this?

Very easily - watch the trajectory of the ball before and after it passes the post. They don't deviate like that for no reason.

Just wait and see what the AFL says about it this week.

 

[JT_the_Man]

Hahaha turn it up.

 

[Orange Agent]

Here is that other angle where the ball went on the goal side of the post

Not sure how the other vision shows the ball in front of the post

This is BS, it depends where you pause it, any shot on goal can be made to look like this as a still.

 

[PowerForGood]

Then how do you explain this?

Very good work by the AFL to not show the kick in full speed - looked like a post in real time and looks the same every time I look at it.

Just need the AFL to come out and say it was the correct call now.

 

[Scorpus]

This is BS, it depends where you pause it, any shot on goal can be made to look like this as a still.

Not sure what you're on about, it's the exact moment that - in that vision - the ball passes on the goal side of the post.

In the other vision it passes in front of the post and through for what appears to be a behind. I don't really know why the two different angles show two different things

 

[PowerForGood]

Half stirring. I'd be livid with Wines if I was you though.
Amateurs at the AFL. You'd be better off with tarot cards deciding on goal reviews. It stinks.

I am livid. I'm also realistic that the Crows missed a lot of shots and dominated field play mostly. But for all that we led, and this s**t took it away.

 

[blue harvest]

Crows were kicking to the left of screen the ball past the left goal post and went in front of it through for a point.

You're wrong on this one. The slo mo replay showing the ball going left in front of the post is on rewind, ie it is coming back to Jenkin's boot. It went through the goals.

 

[maskmcgee]

Very easily - watch the trajectory of the ball before and after it passes the post.

Why don't you take a look at which side of the post the ball goes. It clearly goes in front of the goalpost, not behind. Hitting the post is irrelevant.

 

[donbooger]

I just watched the last two minutes. The ball went through goal side don't get how all those still are supposed to prove a point ball is going left to right side so in front of post is goal side.

Whether it hit the post, don't know.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

[blue harvest]

Yes it did. Ball moving from right to left and in front of the left hand goal.post. Point. Watch it again, had to pass behind the goal post to be a goal.

The vision you are watching is on rewind. Watch it the correct way and you will see it went through the goals.

 

[Orange Agent]

So when he says "post" to his teammate on the field 5 seconds after the kick, you think he was thinking Twitter?

He's on a worse angle to tell that than the goal ump.

 

[mulz]

Still over 2 and half minutes left, its hardly the last kick of the game, the scoreline flattered Port