Port Adelaide lose by 3 points after a wrong Goal Review against the Crows in the dying stages

[onebillsdrive]

Don't know what why posters here are stunned it's just a typical umpire balls up .... When do they get anything right!

 

[Adelaide Hawk]

Don't know what why posters here are stunned it's just a typical umpire balls up .... When do they get anything right!

Especially goal reviews. They get so many of them wrong, I wonder why they still have them.

 

[magpienato]

Get over it. You have 4 quarters to win the game and you choked it.

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[RePete]

I was at the ground in the perfect position to see the goal. Ball clearly missed the post from what I saw - didn't see any deviation in the ball either. I was surprised when they called a score review, so were the people immediately around me.

 

[PowerForGood]

Get over it. You have 4 quarters to win the game and you choked it.

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app

Well spoken by someone who's team is the most favoured in the AFL by a fair margin for 4 years now.

Didnt know we have to be TWO goals up to win a game just in case of goal review f-ups. Like Ken said, lets hope it doesnt happen GF day.

 

[blue harvest]

It was moving from right to left as he had hooked it around his body. Looks a clear behind to me, probably also hitting the post.

Impossible for ball to be moving right to left in front of post from where he kicked it.
You are watching it on rewind.
Watch live play, the kick is rising as it goes through. The replay you are watching from right to left in front of post the ball is dropping, it's going back to his boot, it's on rewind.

 

[Power Raid]

I don't see the big deal

Ollie missed a sitter

move on

 

[Mr_Moogle]

I don't really see how that footage could be considered conclusive either way. Referring to the umpires original decision is what the rules dictate. I don't understand the conspiracy theories. If the ball hit the post, I can understand being annoyed at the goal umpire for getting it wrong. I don't understand why anybody would be annoyed at the reviewer for deeming the footage inconclusive though.

 

[Cosmic Energy]

Impossible for ball to be moving right to left in front of post from where he kicked it.
You are watching it on rewind.
Watch live play, the kick is rising as it goes through. The replay you are watching from right to left in front of post the ball is dropping, it's going back to his boot, it's on rewind.

You must be taking the piss.

 

[Gavin Excell]

I don't really see how that footage could be considered conclusive either way. Referring to the umpires original decision is what the rules dictate. I don't understand the conspiracy theories. If the ball hit the post, I can understand being annoyed at the goal umpire for getting it wrong. I don't understand why anybody would be annoyed at the reviewer for deeming the footage inconclusive though.

Yes its inconclusive. Anyone says otherwise is full of it

 

[Rabman]

Does that justify an incompetent score review by an anonymous official?

Wines goal would of meant the game would of been over and this scenario wouldn't of happened.

 

[magpienato]

Ken Hinkley is the biggest w***er. Show some ****ing balls and sportsmanship. Whining about how "the AFL should be ashamed". MATE YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED YOU JUST GOT BEATEN BY ADELAIDE. ****ing pathetic.

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[PowerForGood]

I don't really see how that footage could be considered conclusive either way. Referring to the umpires original decision is what the rules dictate. I don't understand the conspiracy theories. If the ball hit the post, I can understand being annoyed at the goal umpire for getting it wrong. I don't understand why anybody would be annoyed at the reviewer for deeming the footage inconclusive though.

But the reviewer did NOT look at all the footage available. If they did, then it would have been overturned no doubt.

 

[blue harvest]

You must be taking the piss.

Go and watch it again, you got this one wrong, you are watching the vision in reverse.

 

[PowerForGood]

Wines goal would of meant the game would of been over and this scenario wouldn't of happened.

So if we were in front DESPITE all those screw ups, why should we have to accept a f-up of this magnitude?

 

[LicoriceAllsorts]

Why can't they use hot spot?

 

[blue harvest]

But the reviewer did NOT look at all the footage available. If they did, then it would have been overturned no doubt.

I haven't seen any footage that removed doubt. Is there another angle?

 

[yeee_haaaa!!!!!]

Well spoken by someone who's team is the most favoured in the AFL by a fair margin for 4 years now.

Didnt know we have to be TWO goals up to win a game just in case of goal review f-ups. Like Ken said, lets hope it doesnt happen GF day.

Go and suck on some more lemons. Port were outplayed for the vast majority of the game and were lucky to be within 5 goals. Port still had time to win the game. Just as crows still had time to win it even if it had been called a point. Port just Not good enough on the day

 

[Mr_Moogle]

But the reviewer did NOT look at all the footage available. If they did, then it would have been overturned no doubt.

Which angle are you talking about? None of the footage I've seen was conclusive.

 

[Handyandy]

I was more upset by the wines miss. Good on Jenkins, his candour was refreshing. brilliant game. Both showdowns have been sensational.

 

[Demonic Ascent]

The picture you posted showed the ball moving from left to right of screen in front of the goal post, doesn't it?

No

 

[Cosmic Energy]

Go and watch it again, you got this one wrong, you are watching the vision in reverse.

Look at post 108 whether it’s forward or reverse it’s always on the wrong side of the post to be a goal.

 

[Rob]

You can see the ball pass in front of the post.

I can't tell whether i'm going completely mental or all these people saying it was inconclusive are completely blind.

I swear the ball has gone the wrong side of the post. Whether it hit the post doesn't really matter - it hasn't even gone through the big sticks in the first place.

 

[King Elvis]

Jokes aside, did any Adelaide fans bother doing a proper review of the Grand Final last year?

All you need to do is compare the average amount of time which Tiger players were given before being called to 'play on', vs the same figure for Adelaide players.

It was such an obvious sham that I am honestly surprised no Adelaide fans have bothered to start a blog about it or something.

And here you are, gloating about a match being rigged for you rather than against you.

Take a cold hard look at yourselves, you clowns.

A couple of YouTube vids pulling apart the shit umpiring, but nothing on the time to play on.

Have you done the numbers?

 

[magpienato]

Well spoken by someone who's team is the most favoured in the AFL by a fair margin for 4 years now.

Didnt know we have to be TWO goals up to win a game just in case of goal review f-ups. Like Ken said, lets hope it doesnt happen GF day.

How old are you? I hope youre not above the age or 12 and still think that umpires for whatever reason 'favour' teams. Grow up. Richmond are almost dead last in free kicks yet they're one of the best teams going around. How can you explain that? Instead of blaming umpires how about you hold your own team accountable. Port had 4 quarters to kick a higher score than Adelaide and they didnt. End. Of. Story.

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app