Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't wait until he retires, suffers from concussion related issues afterwards, then tries to sue the AFL. And they just roll out highlight after highlight pointing out how he created the high contact through his own actions.Joel Selwood retiring would be so good for the game
It'll be careless, low impact and high contact anyway which is just a fine.There's nothing in that Garry Rohan swinging arm Neale hammed it up, clear as a bell there was no head contact.
I'm no Garry Rohan fan but Neale deserved it.It'll be careless, low impact and high contact anyway which is just a fine.
Because the AFL still doesn't have any MRO guidelines that punish non-footballing actions more heavily.
Not having to fund an entire state league helpsSadly it does because they own their own stadium with no one leaching off their gate takings. Unlike former SANFL and now the SMA.
All punches are now classified as International.It'll be careless, low impact and high contact anyway which is just a fine.
Because the AFL still doesn't have any MRO guidelines that punish non-footballing actions more heavily
And you just know, one day someone is going to be charged with intentional, medium impact to the body and be coping a suspenion. They'll then successfully appeal the ruling by arguing that it was careless because they were trying to punch them in the head.
Oh come on mate.
You and I could exercise in an old school gym over summer and come out looking like Brutus Beefcake and SGT Slaughter by preseason.
If they are gonna class across the shoulders as high they also need to sight Neale for the clenched fist push to Rohan's neck which caused the reaction.All punches are now classified as International.
So, this should be classified as
INTENTIONAL
HIGH CONTACT
LOW IMPACT
= 1 match
IF they deem that there was no contact made to Neales head, then they must charge him with staging... will be interesting.
‘We got Gary up the front and as a group we said ‘instead of being a mercurial small forward who can’t blow out a candle, be a full-time onballer with a tank bigger than Robert Harvey and Shane Crawford’s combined’, and Gary said ‘ok’’
It depends if they agree with Neale that the punch hit him in the head after the shoulder - it really makes no difference if it first hit the shoulder.If they are gonna class across the shoulders as high they also need to sight Neale for the clenched fist push to Rohan's neck which caused the reaction.
I'd be getting rid of the 18.6.3 (a) at the very least. If the tackler forces an illegal disposal, genuine attempt or not, it should be to the tacklers advantage.
2021 is all about givig back to Victorian footy after the year they had in 2020.
Problem with it, the rules are there to benefit the one willing to win the ball, not the Kane Cornes sweating off for a tackle.I'd be getting rid of the 18.6.3 (a) at the very least. If the tackler forces an illegal disposal, genuine attempt or not, it should be to the tacklers advantage.
The magical no handed handball.Can only assume the umpire thought he got a handball away.
It depends if they agree with Neale that the punch hit him in the head after the shoulder - it really makes no difference if it first hit the shoulder.
If theydon’t think it made contact with Neales head - then he has to be charged with staging.
They'll defend the decision as no prior opportunity with the ball being dislodged by the tackle.Can only assume the umpire thought he got a handball away.