Mega Thread Port Forum General AFL Thread Part 27

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

State skipper.
Magpies leading goalkicker on a few occasions.

Agree he should be a Legend, but the HoF has strange criteria that they apply when deciding who to elevate. It's based on either your playing record or your coaching record, not both.

People like Fos, Jack, Oatey, Kerley et al were great coaches as well as excellent players, and if you look at their combined contribution of excellence in the sphere of their sport, the reasons for ranking them at the highest level are absolutely compelling.
Oatey should get in just for inventing the check side kick.
 
It would also trace to when coaches started having umpteen assistants and more tactical focus, who was in the box with Blight during the camry flags John Reid & Darrel Hart that was about it lol.

The answer is the same as it has been for all sports that were overall semi pro.

Big lumps that used to get injured or were slow once professional were able to get their speed and endurance up enough, which led to the good big un ousting the good little un.

In rugby the difference is so stark that pre and post professionalism are almost entirely different sports.
 
State skipper.
Magpies leading goalkicker on a few occasions.

Agree he should be a Legend, but the HoF has strange criteria that they apply when deciding who to elevate. It's based on either your playing record or your coaching record, not both.

People like Fos, Jack, Oatey, Kerley et al were great coaches as well as excellent players, and if you look at their combined contribution of excellence in the sphere of their sport, the reasons for ranking them at the highest level are absolutely compelling.

Really? That’s ridiculous, legend or fame status should be on the whole body of work for a sport as well as ambassadorship.
 
N.Murphy tribute match.
A loss for us this weekend.

Didn’t work out for the dees in the opening round, although McRae likes to use emotion to get his boys going.

I’m doubtful it will make much difference though, the sacked coach rebound is a bit of a myth too, I think clubs lose those games just as much as they win.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
For once can Hinkley go into this game with confidence and drum it into our players that they should do it easily if they apply themselves and don’t for once feel intimidated by the Collingwood team or their crowd. Embrace it, we should be confident.

So many writing us off in this one, but we are playing much better footy than Collingwood right now. They are starting to get going but I feel like their form is still a fair way off last year.

Port by 5 points. We will survive a late scare.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Didn’t work out for the dees in the opening round, although McRae likes to use emotion to get his boys going.

I’m doubtful it will make much difference though, the sacked coach rebound is a bit of a myth too, I think clubs lose those games just as much as they win.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I think the point with that Willsy is that if the sacked coach was as likely to win the game as lose then he probably wouldn't have been sacked in the first place.
 
The answer is the same as it has been for all sports that were overall semi pro.

Big lumps that used to get injured or were slow once professional were able to get their speed and endurance up enough, which led to the good big un ousting the good little un.

In rugby the difference is so stark that pre and post professionalism are almost entirely different sports.

Much like the pre and post professionalism Haka.

FNcNcO.gif
 
For once can Hinkley go into this game with confidence and drum it into our players that they should do it easily if they apply themselves and don’t for once feel intimidated by the Collingwood team or their crowd. Embrace it, we should be confident.

So many writing us off in this one, but we are playing much better footy than Collingwood right now. They are starting to get going but I feel like their form is still a fair way off last year.

Port by 5 points. We will survive a late scare.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com


I was at the Pies Hawks clash and they basically played 1 quarter of footy.

Frampton played well from memory.
 
I have no issues with Dunstall being elevated to a legend. I just think there are too many legends.

It kind of devalues the achievement. Particularly when there is different entry criteria for different states.
It is a bullsit category.

An arbitary 10% rule of those already in the HoF get elevated.

The 100 players and 10 coaches who were the inaugural inductees in 1996 are all legendary figures in shaping the game, otherwise they would not have been inaugural inductees.

They all might make it to that status in 80 to 100 years time.

Just more AFL marketing wank.
 
Much like the pre and post professionalism Haka.

FNcNcO.gif

What even is that? They look like they're in the front row of a Status Quo concert.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top