- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
None of them except Treloar, Hampton, McCarthy and there's probably a couple more.Got to love the blinkers on the GWS crew...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
None of them except Treloar, Hampton, McCarthy and there's probably a couple more.Got to love the blinkers on the GWS crew...
How about doing that pick swap with st kilda and we throw in lyons too?
None of them except Treloar, Hampton, McCarthy and there's probably a couple more.
They need points for their academy picks than high draft picks atmI don't see why GWS would do that, they lose Hampton and downgrade 2 top 10 picks picks for pick 28?
Still like Vince more for that role, really stopped him from having any influence.Just a thought - would it be worth bringing in Ryan Crowley?
I'd just play him twice a year - both on Dangerfield.
Still like Vince more for that role, really stopped him from having any influence.
If Dangerfield starts to get the Joel Selwood treatment with the umpires after all these years of getting very little, I'll rage.
Because they need more points for their academy picks. That deal gives them an extra 300 or so.I don't see why GWS would do that, they lose Hampton and downgrade 2 top 10 picks picks for pick 28?
We are dropping VB from the SANFL? Harsh but fair.Why not ? We could drop VB for those games.
Compo picks can be traded.If no trades involving players are done using Picks 28 & 32 can definitely see them packaging them up and looking to trade them for one of either Brisbane's Pick 21 or Gold Coast's Pick 22 (would suggest Sun's compo pick @ 19 but don't think they're able to trade it)
We are dropping VB from the SANFL? Harsh but fair.
What about if we did the pick swap with Essendon.... 4 & 23?Yeah, I don't think the difference between 5 and 9 would be great enough to warrant an 11 pick slide from 13-24.
Might consider it for Gold Coasts 3 and 22. Gives us the surity of getting the guy we would be hoping to slide to 5.
I don't think you can deny that the balance of a squad - age and games played profile - is historically a specific makeup. Sure you can get anomalies, but on the whole, the premiers tend to have players that predominantly fall into specific brackets of age and games played. If your squad is not in these brackets, the likelihood of winning the flag is small. So whether it's a window or a profile is irrelevant really, because it is a fact.there is no such thing as a premiership window.
people need to let go of that ridicolous notion.
Nobody is really quite sure what Atkins' contract situation is. He, along with Lyons, may already be contracted for 2016.Is Atkins still out of contract? Wouldnt be surprised if he is been offered around.
I'd much rather 9 and 13 than 5
Not sure how I feel about the pick 9 and 13 for 5 rumour.
Because they need more points for their academy picks. That deal gives them an extra 300 or so.
Just a thought - would it be worth bringing in Ryan Crowley?
I'd just play him twice a year - both on Dangerfield.
I think if you go by the draft points system we are paying overs there. Doubt we will let both go. It will be only 9 or 13.
Can anyone confirm how many senior spots we have available on our list now?
By my calc we only have 2 senior spots left but 4 draft picks.
5 years ago..Hampton was likened to McLeod of all players
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl...y-curtly-hampton/story-e6frf3e3-1225920781993
Still like Vince more for that role, really stopped him from having any influence.
If Dangerfield starts to get the Joel Selwood treatment with the umpires after all these years of getting very little, I'll rage.