- Moderator
- #351
Re: RND 9 - Carlton v Melbourne Sunday 27th May 3.15PM @ MCG
ratten been saying for weeks thats what they've wanted to do
ratten been saying for weeks thats what they've wanted to do
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That's rich coming someone with your record and attitude. The sort of supporter who whinged about not having Cotchin because Kreuzer clearly isn't 100%. Someone Judd was referring to with his comment that the footy public can't remember past the last two weeks.
Really can't be stuffed reading pre-match threads to see the likes of "I can't believe this player" was selected again. I don't think all of them will make it either, but GAGF if you don't want to support them trying to get us the four points.
Well if kruz isn't 100 percent then he won't play this week.
Mate we are all frustrated we should be a top 2 side and just got embarrassed by a side who didn't make the 8 , the battling saints and a side we beat by 10 goals in the finals.
I am not sure why you don't rate our list, as to accept the last month shows you have a much lower expectation than I do of the side.
Me, the coach, the players and the club expect top 4 and a flag , you appear happy to squeeze into the 8?
Yep, it's frustrating, but media hype & expectation doesn't necessarily equal reality. Last year, we never beat a top 4 side, never came close to hawks or pies.
We have a talented list, but we lack a hulk forward who can stand up in packs & bring the ball to ground, ie. cloke / Dawes, j-pod / Hawkins, kr eddy / lynch / darling, buddy, Hurley, all from other clubs that jump to mind. The absence of a beefy forward is ok when a side is running, but in contested footy - especially finals, a hulk is crucial. The club recruited Rowe for that purpose, he's out, along with casboult, Mitchell, none of whom have played senior footy in any event. Hence, 3 ruckman r playing this weekend, presumably kruz to play permanent / hulk forward. Waite is out, but he's more a "floating" type mark than a 'crash & bash"
Hendo could perhaps fill the void, but that would b robbing the back line, guys like Watson r still young & have been well beaten when played at senior level - at this stage, watto isn't the answer 4 chb against teams we'd play in finals
Obviously, our key is our runners, nullify these guys and our deficiencies crack open. We're not designed for contested footy, hence clubs playing an extra man round stoppages / when we've tried to match that, the opposition just bring another man up.
most disappointing in recent weeks is the ease in which oppositions clear the ball in stoppages. While ratts has coped criticism from supporters, I'm not 100% convinced it's ratts. In stoppages, it seems the opposition wants the ball more while we stand back. It's easy to say the players aren't listening to the coach - because they don't understand him, that's a cop out. They understood him against collingwood. It's highly unlikely a coach would say to a player " don't get the ball, " for mine there could be three issues & all of them may apply (1) we just don't have enough contested midfield types, (2) players r looking 4 easy options, (3) coaching staff have screwed up
Thing is , we don't know whether it's (1) or (3) until we can b sure the players r fully committed. No game plan will work until the players give 100%. If they do & we're still losing , then look at the other factors
Problem now is no Murphy & carrots . Should bigger bodies like though b thrown in the midfield? Perhaps, but does he have the smarts ?
Fact is, if we have to try other options in the midfield & up forward then we're not settled. We're in a position where we're having to try new things, trying new things takes trial & error - just because something's not working doesn't mean th coaching staff aren't trying
Everyone knows there's problems, but haven't seen anyone come up with a good solution
Key problem is the top 4 contenders all have settled structures by now, we don't.
If Joseph is going to be in the side he should either be the sub or be played in the middle (as a tagger).
In his first year he was a revelation playing as a tagger on the likes of G.Ablett. With all the quality in the midfield he has been moved to playing in the back pocket, and he is in trouble when he is one on one.
With the loss of Carrazzo (the prefered midfield tagger) I think Joseph should be moved in there with maybe Armfield being moved into a back pocket.
I have much more confidence with Armfield in a one on one than I do with joseph.
Well said but surely after this much time we would of landed on a workable structure? How many more top 10 draft picks, how much more time does one need.
Judd is 28, Scotland 31 and Waite 30 ish so time is running out. In terms of our window to win a flag this year is probably our best shot.
Especially now the superside of the last 5 years the cats are on the downswing , we won't get a better chance.
Unfortunately AJ is limited with where he can go. Yes he did a good job in a game against Ablett some years ago but the expectation of taggers these days is that you do good stuff offensively as well and he doesn't do that. That's why he doesn't do tagging roles in the middle anymore.
Adelaide's Robert Shirley was basically retired from the game because all he could do was a defensive lock down job. (both Ablett and Judd nominated him as the hardest tagger they'd delt with when he was playing)
Our midfield taggers this year have been Carrots and to a lesser degree Army, both because they can offer attacking football as well.
AJ is also not too great on small forwards both with reading the ball coming in and in the air.
That really only leaves the wings and forward line and we're pretty solid for players in those parts of the ground.
You'd assume Ratts still sees something to work with, both from a development point of view and as depth at least, otherwise they wouldn't have re-signed him.
Disagree. Joseph is attacking and better with the ball than Armfield. Like Carrots, Joseph was a ball magnet and a midfielder as a junior. Armfield wasn't even a footballer until he dumped Union at 17. Unlike Tuohy, he hasn't really learnt how to kick, where to kick and where to run. Butchers his set shots and inside fifties.Unfortunately AJ is limited with where he can go. Yes he did a good job in a game against Ablett some years ago but the expectation of taggers these days is that you do good stuff offensively as well and he doesn't do that. That's why he doesn't do tagging roles in the middle anymore.
Adelaide's Robert Shirley was basically retired from the game because all he could do was a defensive lock down job. (both Ablett and Judd nominated him as the hardest tagger they'd delt with when he was playing)
Our midfield taggers this year have been Carrots and to a lesser degree Army, both because they can offer attacking football as well.
Only thing Armfield might have over Joseph is his pace and possibly an ability to follow team instructions. They're the only reasons I can think of why he's named ahead of Joseph. Not saying Joseph is elite, but he is a better mark, a better kick for goal and better at playing the ball through the middle.
Disagree. Joseph is attacking and better with the ball than Armfield. Like Carrots, Joseph was a ball magnet and a midfielder as a junior. Armfield wasn't even a footballer until he dumped Union at 17. Unlike Tuohy, he hasn't really learnt how to kick, where to kick and where to run. Butchers his set shots and inside fifties.
Only thing Armfield might have over Joseph is his elite pace and possibly an ability to follow team instructions. They're the only reasons I can think of why he's named ahead of Joseph. Not saying Joseph is elite, but he is a better mark, a better kick for goal and better at playing the ball through the middle. AJ used his pace and agility against Freo last year to carry the ball on the larger Subiaco ground. Isn't a small defender.
Hope to see Watson get a go.
Whilst I know his form in the VFL may not have warranted it, I personally think the leaving players for too long in the VFL has a detrimental effect - lower standard, scrappy football, inferior grounds can sometimes ****** the development of a player.
He was highly rated prior to the draft - let's get him in and see how goes for a 3-4 weeks and see if he can play.
Agreed about leaving players too long.
I have mentioned earlier that collingwood and geelong and box hill havent done too well in the vfl but their afl teams are. players dont have to set the world on fire in the 2's to get a call up but should each have individual goals set for them to reach while rotating through the 22.
for the selections so far im not too worried about them and will pass final judgement tonight when i see the final team, everything is in the the air til then.
good to see collins warnock and hopefully watson in though give them a chance to see what they can do.
Not saying this will happen with Watson but we have the opportunity with our form and injuries to give him an extended run and see how he goes !! If Jamison and Henderson are both playing down back cannot see how he could not play as a third tall or 'go to' man just for his kicking (dare I say - like a Josh Hunt ??)..
Hope to see Watson get a go.
Whilst I know his form in the VFL may not have warranted it, I personally think the leaving players for too long in the VFL has a detrimental effect - lower standard, scrappy football, inferior grounds can sometimes ****** the development of a player.
He was highly rated prior to the draft - let's get him in and see how goes for a 3-4 weeks and see if he can play.
Double Bunkum. Yazz to hbf, Hendo to CHB are just 2.
I just hate posters that just know what this player or this coach can or cannot do. Get a clue. A senior AFL coach that cannot see strengths or weaknesses of players? Really? That's your contention? FFS. It just gets worse around here. And you had such a promising start. And just to round it out, your Watson Kennedy comparison rant. Kennedy spent nearly 2 years playing in the WAFL before getting his run in the WC side. Watson is a second year player. Get a grip son.