On the Couch Walls was suggesting that Essendon would be in the depths of dispair for several seasons to come and that WCE would rebuild much faster than that of Essendon due to the quality of their youngsters.
We beat WCE by 22 points, would this not be an indication that our younger players are further developed than that of the Eagles?
What about the fact that Reimers had more possessions than any other WCE player? Or that Neagle kicked as many goals as anyone in the game? Or that Stanton had more possessions, tackles and inside 50s than any WCE player? Or that WCE only had 3 players 22 or under pick up more than 15 possessions compared with 5 of our players 22 or under? Or the fact that we had as many players that had played under 50 games?
Can someone explain to me how Walls believes WCE players will develop far quicker than Essendon's???
We beat WCE by 22 points, would this not be an indication that our younger players are further developed than that of the Eagles?
What about the fact that Reimers had more possessions than any other WCE player? Or that Neagle kicked as many goals as anyone in the game? Or that Stanton had more possessions, tackles and inside 50s than any WCE player? Or that WCE only had 3 players 22 or under pick up more than 15 possessions compared with 5 of our players 22 or under? Or the fact that we had as many players that had played under 50 games?
Can someone explain to me how Walls believes WCE players will develop far quicker than Essendon's???