I wouldnāt be against trading pick 21 for Lobb if thatās what it took Getting the deal done.Did brissy just go and get our Lobb pick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldnāt be against trading pick 21 for Lobb if thatās what it took Getting the deal done.Did brissy just go and get our Lobb pick
Probably starts getting pretty hard for Freo to turn down to be honestI wouldnāt be against trading pick 21 for Lobb if thatās what it took Getting the deal done.
So what you're saying no genuine reporter has confirmed it is a front ended contract
So after all this we can safely assume his contract isn't front loaded at all hence takes some gloss off his valueI haven't gone searching for it.
The fact of the matter is that we aren't handing him over unless the price is right.
Based on what we have heard so far i don't see how the price is going to be right.
We obviously think we are in a window to win a premiership right now and think he is extremely valuable to that happening so unless we are satisfied that we have a replacement lined up i don't see how or why we could trade him for a draft pick that is unlikely to contribute immediately.
If the price is too good for us to refuse, we might just do the deal.
However, even uncontracted next year he still has to be traded unless he goes to the draft. So let's assume your best offer now is a 2nd rounder, can we get a 3rd rounder for him uncontracted next year? Most likely, so his value is unlikely to decrease enough in a year to scare us off of holding him.
There's a lot of confirmation bias going both direction on that one. There's no safe assumption here.
I can save you the trouble. Itās already been established that the front loaded story came from one Freo Bigfooty poster.I haven't gone searching for it.
The fact of the matter is that we aren't handing him over unless the price is right.
Based on what we have heard so far i don't see how the price is going to be right.
We obviously think we are in a window to win a premiership right now and think he is extremely valuable to that happening so unless we are satisfied that we have a replacement lined up i don't see how or why we could trade him for a draft pick that is unlikely to contribute immediately.
If the price is too good for us to refuse, we might just do the deal.
However, even uncontracted next year he still has to be traded unless he goes to the draft. So let's assume your best offer now is a 2nd rounder, can we get a 3rd rounder for him uncontracted next year? Most likely, so his value is unlikely to decrease enough in a year to scare us off of holding him.
Mark Duffield over here did on his podcast, but the bloke has just taken a voluntary redundancy with the West Australian.So what you're saying no genuine reporter has confirmed it is a front ended contract
Correct Jon Ralph and Cal Twoomey have both said its between 700-750k took me the same amount of time on google as it should've taken Essendon not to hire their CEOI can save you the trouble. Itās already been established that the front loaded story cam from one Freo Bigfooty poster.
What Tim Gossage doesnāt understand is Lobb is contracted so he really doesnāt have a choice if a trade canāt get doneMark Duffield over here did on his podcast, but the bloke has just taken a voluntary redundancy with the West Australian.
I don't think you empathise with how annoying the wider media can be about Freo - I mean there was a dude on the radio Tim Gossage (West Coast supporter) that told our list manager live on air that there's no chance Lobb will be at Freo next season??
We already don't get a fair crack here in the WA media, let alone from Victoria.
Fremantle is in this weird place where they're not s**t enough to draw the ire of the media (aka North), but never successful enough to get whacked by tall poppy syndrome, so in a sense, we fly under the radar a bit from the media from most angles.
He's Freos best forward. And that's the point.You're acting as if Lobb is one of the best Key Forwards in the comp here
Which means his output isn't that hard to replaceHe's Freos best forward. And that's the point.
Mark Duffield over here did on his podcast, but the bloke has just taken a voluntary redundancy with the West Australian.
I don't think you empathise with how annoying the wider media can be about Freo - I mean there was a dude on the radio Tim Gossage (West Coast supporter) that told our list manager live on air that there's no chance Lobb will be at Freo next season??
We already don't get a fair crack here in the WA media, let alone from Victoria.
Fremantle is in this weird place where they're not s**t enough to draw the ire of the media (aka North), but never successful enough to get whacked by tall poppy syndrome, so in a sense, we fly under the radar a bit from the media from most angles.
No. We should be able to do Lobb outside of what we get for Dunkley. It would be a fail on the Dogs part if Dunkley only nets us a F1 and Lobb.Do we all think Pick 21 for Lobb if you get that as part of Dunkley?
I do agree it would be a fail. Personally think the lions have done the dirty trading pick 15No. We should be able to do Lobb outside of what we get for Dunkley. It would be a fail on the Dogs part if Dunkley only nets us a F1 and Lobb.
Iād be the same, especially if we get a couple of picks for Dunkley.I wouldnāt be against trading pick 21 for Lobb if thatās what it took Getting the deal done.
Lobb being contracted and needed does mean Freo might get overs this year.I haven't gone searching for it.
The fact of the matter is that we aren't handing him over unless the price is right.
Based on what we have heard so far i don't see how the price is going to be right.
We obviously think we are in a window to win a premiership right now and think he is extremely valuable to that happening so unless we are satisfied that we have a replacement lined up i don't see how or why we could trade him for a draft pick that is unlikely to contribute immediately.
If the price is too good for us to refuse, we might just do the deal.
However, even uncontracted next year he still has to be traded unless he goes to the draft. So let's assume your best offer now is a 2nd rounder, can we get a 3rd rounder for him uncontracted next year? Most likely, so his value is unlikely to decrease enough in a year to scare us off of holding him.
Jackson is not a forward. He'll be primarily ruck/mid. Corbett is 190cm, and will play the Logue role in the forward line.I suspect this is going to last until Jackson and Corbett get over the line for Freo, then they can justify trading Lobb for pick 30 since he's no longer needed structurally.
It actually came from the WA journo who has the most connections to fremantle.I can save you the trouble. Itās already been established that the front loaded story came from one Freo Bigfooty poster.
A google search will also tell you that we held Rory after he requested a trade last year when in reality GWS never actually made an offer.Correct Jon Ralph and Cal Twoomey have both said its between 700-750k took me the same amount of time on google as it should've taken Essendon not to hire their CEO