Game Day Round 1 Match Day Discussion - And Away We Go !

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
For every team with Guilden on the ground there appears to be 10 without. Similar with Rowe.
Kudos to those that did, but I don’t know how people started him on the ground to begin with TBH.

Campbell, Powell, Jordon all above him before the round started in the eyes of many. Throw highly rated Berry in to the mix, and also mature-aged strong bodied Scott and I’m surprised he got the E let alone started on the ground in SC teams.
 
Not necessarily mid pricers - teams that avoided most of the big 6. Flynn at R2, Laird instead of Lloyd, Macrae instead of Neale, Dusty or Dunks instead of Danger. Frees up a heap of cash to go extra keepers elsewhere.

Note - Im not one of the above, having selected 5 of the big 6.
I'm all of the above except I have both Neale and Macrae and my score is still not great. Too many premos going 5-10 points low and wrong rookies benched for me.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Jordan scored well with a 78. No way im watching a replay of Dees v Anchors so can someone say if it was a worthy 78 pt game or kissed on the dik a bit ? 15D 5 mks 5 tkles sounds sweet as hell.
Kent Brockman 2 goals but 22 pts WTF !!! They won and he kicked 2 so at least he's safe for a week and gets to reload.
Rowe also stuck on my bench with Kent, but impressive and gets a starting gig next week.
Just 3 guys today.
Hopefully somewhere around 2050-2100. I;d be happy with that and hopefully anywhere top 20000 start considering i couldnt change anything. Gawn was my set and forget (c). Primo rucks can GAGFed.
Dont have Bergman so i'll watch him as a priority today and see if worth targetting for a full stable of yearlings.
Sux to be in Sydney after such great weather in Tas.
If was definitely worth a 78. Was very good. Classy.
 
Is Viney back next week? Is Jordan likely to make way?

Big questions to ponder... along with to trade or not to trade this week to get in 4 trades before price rises?





Jordon stays
 
Jordan scored well with a 78. No way im watching a replay of Dees v Anchors so can someone say if it was a worthy 78 pt game or kissed on the dik a bit ? 15D 5 mks 5 tkles sounds sweet as hell.
Kent Brockman 2 goals but 22 pts WTF !!! They won and he kicked 2 so at least he's safe for a week and gets to reload.
Rowe also stuck on my bench with Kent, but impressive and gets a starting gig next week.
Just 3 guys today.
Hopefully somewhere around 2050-2100. I;d be happy with that and hopefully anywhere top 20000 start considering i couldnt change anything. Gawn was my set and forget (c). Primo rucks can GAGFed.
Dont have Bergman so i'll watch him as a priority today and see if worth targetting for a full stable of yearlings.
Sux to be in Sydney after such great weather in Tas.
Jordon was good. Big first half with fiddy odd. He ain’t going anywhere.
 
Is Viney back next week? Is Jordan likely to make way?

Big questions to ponder... along with to trade or not to trade this week to get in 4 trades before price rises?


No big questions to ponder on that front. No chance JordOn makes way. He was in the better half of players yesterday. Sparrow most likely to move out.
 
If was definitely worth a 78. Was very good. Classy.
Jordon was good. Big first half with fiddy odd. He ain’t going anywhere.
Cheers taaaa. Saves me watching the replay.
Brilliant. Looks like we have another keeper. Big fan of "classy" :thumbsu: Bonus is that he might have a chance at a decent string of games at Dees. Kachingo$$.
 
Jordon was good. Big first half with fiddy odd. He ain’t going anywhere.
Not sure the SC score counts for much, but he was terrific yesterday. Ran to the right spots, read the play well and was in and under. Also gave away a goal when he was on the run 25m directly in front by passing to a bloke in the goalsquare (stupid idiot should have been selfish). Also missed a pretty easy shot at goal. Could have easily been a 100+ game. His JS is secure IMO.
 
Not sure the SC score counts for much, but he was terrific yesterday. Ran to the right spots, read the play well and was in and under. Also gave away a goal when he was on the run 25m directly in front by passing to a bloke in the goalsquare (stupid idiot should have been selfish). Also missed a pretty easy shot at goal. Could have easily been a 100+ game. His JS is secure IMO.
ok, that does it. I want his babies.
Took the risk with him onfield, but had Rowe on bench. No matter. Early dayz.
 
I'll have to have a look at his CBAs.

With Viney to return I don't like the look of things if he wasn't in for too many.

The fact you blokes started Jordon in the second half in the middle over him concerns me also.
Based on last year, Jones was fortunate to get on more year , played 8 games last year ( had injuries), his skill level was bad when he played. He has 5 more games to get to 300. He is likely to play his 300 at home at G . We have viney melksham hibberd plus the brown and weiderman to come back . Jones will likely to play a fair bit at casey after his 300 th.
 
Not an amazing start, but i'm pretty happy with the roles my team has, even if the performances weren't quite there for some of them.

17/1597, Jelly, Highmore, Powell, Ziebell and Bergman to play.

Missed out on both Gulden and Rowe's score which is a little bit annoying, but small FWD rookies are notoriously volatile, could have easily been a Brockman 25 instead of 100's so not too worried there.

Gulden looks some player though, probably has to start on field now.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Based on last year, Jones was fortunate to get on more year , played 8 games last year ( had injuries), his skill level was bad when he played. He has 5 more games to get to 300. He is likely to play his 300 at home at G . We have viney melksham hibberd plus the brown and weiderman to come back . Jones will likely to play a fair bit at casey after his 300 th.
Jones was better than Hunt or Sparrow yesterday. Still runs to the right spots, gets the ball and makes good decisions IMO. His execution wasn’t great yesterday, but he’s better than others. Agree the only reason he played this year was to reach 300 tho - and he deserves that having been through the past 12 odd years.
 
Seriously though probably a reasonable point. The could reweight the points allocation. A little less for an intercept mark, a bit more for a clearance even one that doesn't hit the mark. A bit less for Danger style 40 meter aimless hoofs, a bit more for a hitout even if it ends up with a neutral result. etc

How do we get a bit more for a clearance when currently zero points are awarded for clearances?
 
Jones was better than Hunt or Sparrow yesterday. Still runs to the right spots, gets the ball and makes good decisions IMO. His execution wasn’t great yesterday, but he’s better than others. Agree the only reason he played this year was to reach 300 tho - and he deserves that having been through the past 12 odd years.
Actually 16 th season this year and yes good to see loyalty rewarded.
 
That’s not a win. That’s ludicrous changing your entire structure in a knee jerk reaction to trade in someone who always plays well Round 1 anyway.

Now you’ve lost the best MID in the game, a proven MID keeper and Young for a guy who has never played a full season, a guy who’s only had one good season during a COVID season, two absolute spuds and an unknown rookie.

Give yourself an uppercut.

Okay so which of Bergman and Sharp is the unknown rookie and which is the absolute spud?
 
Kozi should be selected next week, especially after such a great comeback. He was ok I thought, didn't do anything special but supply was poor at times. Better to give him plenty of games this year and discover his ceiling - we aren't winning any flags.

Brockman ain't going anywhere unless we are crazy. Has a touch of class and looks like the sort of player who will step up under pressure. Ignore his SC score which was heavily affected by a poorly timed 50m penalty.
He gave away a goal to handball to a team mate. Coaches love that stuff!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top