Round 13 Trades

[pincrusher]

Alright Kent's.

Am I hollering a Marshall or bringing in Ziebell for my last forward spot!?

 

[WaynesWorld19]

I meant Richmond Baker via Dunkley
I complete my Forward line and add Bont all in 1 move.

Go for it !

 

[Danco]

Had a bit of bank.
Currently gone:
Out: Scott, Atkins and Constable
In : Naish, Boak and Daniel

Considered Ziebell, but Boak and Daniel both had their byes and leaves me better off next week.

My other forwards are Telly, Danger, Dunkley, Heeney.

Now here's to hoping for a couple of mid downgrades in the next few weeks.

 

[stevebbb]

Don't think I can bring in Naish in because next week I'll have holes in my defence with 2 Adelaide players, Williams and Naish out. Should have all other lines full, but still don't like it... Hmm

Hope we get new blood tonight!

 

[pincrusher]

I'm gonna be real torn on whether or not to get Hately if he's named this weekend. It's either him or Naish. Both have round 14 bye. The problem is, if he's on the extended bench, we won't know whether or not he's in until after Naish has played.

I'm going uber POD with my trades this week. gotta risk it for the biscuit.

 

[stevebbb]

Hurley looks like a good pick up

 

[Suma Magic]

Pretty set on gray and a rookie or two. But boak is still tempting me, despite it making my remaining trade plans very difficult to implement.

What will they average from now on?

Gray: 90?
Boak: 105?

 

[keithrichards]

14 trades and $68.7k

Currently looking at:
Answerth>Bewley
Ross>Clarke
Atkins>Bont

Thoughts?

Current team below:

 

[pincrusher]

Hurley looks like a good pick up

Too inconsistent and too injury prone. Has never played every game in a season through his whole career.

 

[Edmund hunt]

Go for it !

Completed forward line is Kelly, Cameron, Dangerfield, Boak, Worpal and Dunkley

 

[stevebbb]

Too inconsistent and too injury prone. Has never played every game in a season through his whole career.

Can say that for most players lol, but I get your point

Scored way better when Hooker came back into the side. Will be good for 90-95

 

[Benno_900]

Can say that for most players lol, but I get your point

Scored way better when Hooker came back into the side. Will be good for 90-95

Better mid-priced options that are also good for 90+ average:

Laird, Andrews, Stewart, Sicily, Shaw, Rich, Johannisen, Blakely, Weller, Salem, Milera, Crisp, Houston if he stays in the midfield.

 

[stevebbb]

Better mid-priced options that are also good for 90+ average:

Laird, Andrews, Stewart, Sicily, Shaw, Rich, Johannisen, Blakely, Weller, Salem, Milera, Crisp, Houston if he stays in the midfield.

Hurley is the cheapest of the lot and has had his bye. Not really mid-priced when you're talking about $450k-$500k defenders

Aaaaanyway

 

[Benno_900]

Hurley is the cheapest of the lot and has had his bye. Not really mid-priced when you're talking about $450k-$500k defenders

Aaaaanyway

Well I am taking Blakely expecting a 100 average.

Enjoy your Hurley.

 

[stevebbb]

Well I am taking Blakely expecting a 100 average.

Enjoy your Hurley.

Not getting him, was just an observation. Averaging 93 with Hooker in the side, should be good for that.

Good luck with Blakely, I'll be beyond shocked if he plays every game and averages 100

 

[Huttabito]

Pretty set on gray and a rookie or two. But boak is still tempting me, despite it making my remaining trade plans very difficult to implement.

What will they average from now on?

Gray: 90?
Boak: 105?

Boak will have less hair pulling out games.

 

[Suma Magic]

Boak will have less hair pulling out games.

I’m not too fussed about that. Well, in theory I’m not. Just looking for average and value.

 

[mochacinolatte]

What are people general thoughts on Rowan Marshall as a F6? or should I just fork out another 50k for boak?

 

[Winx]

It would be a good week for Fort to get a run wouldn't it.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

I have no idea and even less ****s to give

 

[pincrusher]

It would be a good week for Fort to get a run wouldn't it.

If only he was playing for a team that didn't have the bye.

 

[Gene Simmons]

Man.... typical...I've planned to bring in RGray for the last 2 weeks and I'm thrown a curve ball on the 11th hour....

I was going to go either Petru or BScott -> RGray

But now considering Petru -> MCrouch instead

So effectively its RGray vs MCrouch

 

[pincrusher]

Man.... typical...I've planned to bring in RGray for the last 2 weeks and I'm thrown a curve ball on the 11th hour....

I was going to go either Petru or BScott -> RGray

But now considering Petru -> MCrouch instead

So effectively its RGray vs MCrouch

Gray has had his bye. Crouch hasn't. I'd probably take Crouch if it doesn't hurt your round 14 bye too much.

 

[hsaklag]

ed and loaded

 

[LuvtheKangas]

^ trading out 3 players who have had their bye, for two who haven't and are unlikely to get selected anyway?

Go for it.