Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was alright. 20 touches, plenty of score involvements and a couple of late goals for a roaming Cameron. He made some nice spoils though.I dunno i would have scored Fox rather well in the GF as well
I’d like anyone who said it was impossible to put their hand up. I haven’t seen that personally. I and others have said it won’t be the case if/when best 23 are available.I count 8 defenders, 4 of them tall. If J.Henry isn't a permanent forward then it seems that set up that I've been told is "impossible" could be rolled out
That is my point though he kept Cameron goalless until the behind the back from Danger and a late oneHe was alright. 20 touches, plenty of score involvements and a couple of late goals for a roaming Cameron. He made some nice spoils though.
Warner was a jet and the only one who ever threatened to swing things their way. It's 120 points on that day without him.
Both have been pretty average (Parf actually below average)... I guess at least Bowes has an excuse since he has been injured a couple of times and unable to get a good run at it yet.I see nothing in Bowes at present that puts him ahead of Parfitt.
I saw it.I’d like anyone who said it was impossible to put their hand up. I haven’t seen that personally. I and others have said it won’t be the case if/when best 23 are available.
Any chance Smith ever gets managed?For the supplementary sausage:
Late out: Kolo
Late in: Bowes
Cameron should have had one early in the first too though. But you are correct 2nd and 3rd quarters he was really good on Jezza.That is my point though he kept Cameron goalless until the behind the back from Danger and a late one
To me that is a good game worth at least a 7/10
I'd be happy with a 6, but on that ranking system I'd push Warner up to a 9. He was bloody terrific but had no help.That is my point though he kept Cameron goalless until the behind the back from Danger and a late one
To me that is a good game worth at least a 7/10
Odds on are he plays forward with Sav back.I'll be surprised if J Henry doesn't play forward... Mainly because Jez is out to add another tallish player that can mark overhead.
If he doesn't play forward we are very tall defensively...I'll be surprised if J Henry doesn't play forward... Mainly because Jez is out to add another tallish player that can mark overhead.
Honestly, thanks for that. I had both articles that stated that coaches wanted the change, and genuinely thought that they'd brought it into effect on the basis of what has been happening with other team announcements I've been paying attention to.
I couldn't find these prior team changes to show things one way or the other, so at least now I have confirmation. Must have been just a massive coincidence that the players I was paying attention to were then sub again the next week (literally more than 5 players off the top of my head).
Definitely got that one spectactuarly wrong, apologies to all for the misinformation (though not consciously doing so!)
**********************
These are the articles for anyone who wants to know why I was so adamant, yet so wrong, lol:
More late changes incoming? AFL clarifies team selection rules
The AFL has clarified its stance on team selection, with clubs told they have plenty of flexibility with naming their 26-player squadswww.afl.com.au
“Change the bloody rule”: Healy urges AFL to respond to coach concerns
“No one wants it to stay as it is. We don’t have to wait until the end of the season.”www.sen.com.au
Honestly when they are naming teams if the AFL just said "hey you have to name a sub" the issue goes. Its really easy to solve.All good
It's something which has caused confusion over the course at least this season, and I've seen others interpret the team announcements along a similar line
As for the coaches, I'm not sure there's actually anything stopping them naming the sub on Thursday night - we've done that, especially when our sub is going to be a debutant, and it was either Rohan or Henry where they wasn't named sub on the night but Scott confirmed it at his press conference the next day
Sometimes it seems like coaches complaining just for the sake of complaining
Surely he’s in line.Any chance Smith ever gets managed?
I know we just had a bye, but he's critical, and looked way below par last week
AFL and common sense are you daftHonestly when they are naming teams if the AFL just said "hey you have to name a sub" the issue goes. Its really easy to solve.
Well they can’t… when selecting the best 23.I saw it.
"They just can't fit" has been used by a few.
It may revert later. But it is definitely a structure they are fine with.
Don't forget that's Henry x 2, because as we've seen with all of Hawkins, Cameron, Rohan, Stengle, Close & Miers available, Ollie's the one who's somewhat made way as a lock in that forward line & instead found himself as more of a utility that drifts forwardOdds on are he plays forward with Sav back.
What will be interesting is how they fit all of Sav/Kolo/SDK and Henry in defence once Cameron is back.
Bowes a little more versatile?Both have been pretty average (Parf actually below average)... I guess at least Bowes has an excuse since he has been injured a couple of times and unable to get a good run at it yet.
I forget what a best 23 even looks like. I'm giddy at having 20.Well they can’t… when selecting the best 23.
I'm pretty sure it was more along the lines of, "how do you balance the defence if selecting all of SDK, Kolodjashnij, J. Henry & Ratugolea"I’d like anyone who said it was impossible to put their hand up. I haven’t seen that personally. I and others have said it won’t be the case if/when best 23 are available.
Yeah I have the same feeling. But that said, I had that same feeling before the last time we played them, and look what happened.I refuse to believe the Swans will let us belt them again.
I’m expecting this to be close.
They were more injured than we were in that game.Yeah I have the same feeling. But that said, I had that same feeling before the last time we played them, and look what happened.
Have the same feeling, and if they win, they sit above us on the ladder- real 8 point game for us if we win.I refuse to believe the Swans will let us belt them again.
I’m expecting this to be close.