Both a lot bigger physically if not also taller.I doubt Walker or Fogerty are taller
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both a lot bigger physically if not also taller.I doubt Walker or Fogerty are taller
Fwiiw I thought the trip on Daniher was a more dangerous action than the Rankine incident aside from the outcomes.
Incredibly no free kick was paid and fortunately Joe got up intact
But it was a deliberate trippng act when they were both going full pelt and deserves 2-3 weeks
Lions could be as high as third after the next round if we beat the Eagles and these results happen:
COLL v Geel (an upset on current form)
HAW v Freo in Tassie (not all that unlikely)
MELB v Ess (less likely but surely the Dees have to wake up sooner or later)
Maybe a 5-10% chance of all three happening but not statistically insignificant
Yeah it could be let go. I've just seen some serous injuries as a result of tripping especially in the pre video days and they should come down hard if it's not impulsive which to me this didn't seem to be.Wouldn't be surprised if it's let go but deserves a week IMO
Agree it needs to be looked at. Not sure if there are any good options. Joyce for Lester? Beecken/Brain as a mobile undersized third tall? Not attractive optionsMight need to change up our backline structure if that's the case. A few top teams play 3 genuine tall forwards
Agree it needs to be looked at. Not sure if there are any good options. Joyce for Lester? Beecken/Brain as a mobile undersized third tall? Not attractive options
I have Lester in front of both.
6 contested marks for Walker. Lester could get the Waterman matchup next week which will be really concerning
Truly awful take. Lester has been one of the more consistent defenders for our team over the last 18 months. Plays a role that often has him giving away height to decent forwards to allow Harris to play his game.
So many times Froggy is the player who makes that vital spoil or intercept mark. Not to mention the overlap or kick back into the corridor. Also needs to be taken into consideration that our game style often allows opposition mids plenty of space on turnover. Hard to defend that at times.
Who do you suggest takes Waterman? Joyce ? How did he go against Melbourne?
Fwiiw I thought the trip on Daniher was a more dangerous action than the Rankine incident aside from the outcomes.
Incredibly no free kick was paid and fortunately Joe got up intact
But it was a deliberate trippng act when they were both going full pelt and deserves 2-3 weeks
Thought this was another good outing from the coach's box. Our plans for Hinge, Dawson and Rankine all worked beautifully, despite losing Starce early in the game. If the forward group had functioned well we would've won by 4-5 goals.
Looking at the votes I think there should be more love for Oscar's game. He bullied ROB and had some lovely hit-outs to advantage - something he isn't exactly known for.
Lions could be as high as third after the next round if we beat the Eagles and these results happen:
COLL v Geel (an upset on current form)
HAW v Freo in Tassie (not all that unlikely)
MELB v Ess (less likely but surely the Dees have to wake up sooner or later)
Maybe a 5-10% chance of all three happening but not statistically insignificant
Would also send some of Crows supporters further off the deep end, which would funny to observe.Wouldn't be surprised if it's let go but deserves a week IMO
No doubt having Starce out there would've made life easier, but the game showed we put time into thinking about how to stop Rankine, and then the extra layer of game management when we adapted with Darcy. It could've been pure coincidence watching on TV but I noticed Fletcher go to Rankine a few times when he was further up the ground too.I think the loss of Starce was underplayed. Rankine wasn't getting near the ball while Starce was out there, at least not in any meaningful way + it took away Motty from our defensive half counter attack options as he was running with Rankine. TBH I think we win by 5-8 goals if Starce hadn't been injured.
No doubt having Starce out there would've made life easier, but the game showed we put time into thinking about how to stop Rankine, and then the extra layer of game management when we adapted with Darcy. It could've been pure coincidence watching on TV but I noticed Fletcher go to Rankine a few times when he was further up the ground too.
I’d like to see him miss none so Adelaide are a chance of beating our 2-13th rivals in the next couple weeksStarcevic effectively misses two games because of Rankine. Whilst further disadvantaging Lions on the night.
So baseline should be two weeks (that’s what Starce is missing), plus one or two for the action.
Hope to see Rankine cop 4 personally, but would be happy with 3.
On the game itself, we were incredibly patchy and wasteful. Play like that against a good team and we will get demolished.
Lester 1.92 . Fogarty 1.92 and Walker 1.94Both a lot bigger physically if not also taller.
Sportsbet will give you odds of 24.24 on the multi for all 5 games to go our way, which is an implied probability of 4.13%.Would need GC to beat Port, too.
Around a 5-6% chance that all 5 results go our way - one can hope!
Should we win, the most likely outcome is a move to 5th - I don’t mind the sound of that (for now).
Interesting that Dew was in the coaching box during the game. The first time I think.Thought this was another good outing from the coach's box. Our plans for Hinge, Dawson and Rankine all worked beautifully, despite losing Starce early in the game. If the forward group had functioned well we would've won by 4-5 goals.
Looking at the votes I think there should be more love for Oscar's game. He bullied ROB and had some lovely hit-outs to advantage - something he isn't exactly known for.
Tbh Tex looks half the size again of Lester.Lester 1.92 . Fogarty 1.92 and Walker 1.94