- Aug 15, 2015
- 38,675
- 92,403
And wines isn't gonna get to come
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Umpire was too busy telling off one of our players on the 5m protected area line. He didn't call play on until Elliot was inside the boundary, and the boundary umpire couldn't do anything because play on hadn't been called.How ******* bad is that Elliot goal where he changes direction outside the boundary and isn’t called? Aliir ran in a straight line, as per the rule, and got pinged. Should have been a throw in.
Garbage umpiring as usual.
We didn't waste too many chances that day. We were beaten by a better team with a goat on fire.We may have pushed the flag near certainties last night, but it means nothing come the business end. Reminds me of when we lost to the swans (with buddy at the peak of his powers) by under a kick at the scg in mid-2014, when like last night, were made to pay for our wasted chances. We all know what happened after that…
Same, as the season has gone on, he’s fumbling more, tackling isn’t strong and seems to be struggling to get low. Not sure if the hits are taking it’s tolls.I’m starting to worry about his place in the side.
You could call that Aliir one half a dozen times a game or more if you want. It was a ridiculous call from an overpaid boundary umpire full of his own self importance.
I see it so often through every game it’s always been a bugbear how they allow the play on.You could call that Aliir one half a dozen times a game or more if you want. It was a ridiculous call from an overpaid boundary umpire full of his own self importance.
Or a cheat.One is a great pick up by a boundary umpire and the other is not. The boundary umpire on Elliott’s side must have been an inferior boundary umpire.
The wacky world of afl officiating.
What’s the difference here….
Let's not forget Marshall had a clear throw to Evans which resulted in a goal.
Umpiring wasn't great but we didn't get screwed imo.
The last 5 minutes they did the usual "free kicks don't exist" thing. You still need to pay the obvious ones that are there.
I see it so often through every game it’s always been a bugbear how they allow the play on.
What about the snap shots on goal starting out of bounds? Every shot is the player leaving the line but allowed
YET AGAIN!
Cowardly anon twitter posts like these were amongst the mix. This keeps happening to our Indigenous players agin, and again and a again.
There were issues elsewhere on the ground, but the obvious one is, if we’d kicked 5.3 or 6.2 in our otherwise strong third quarter we win. It was a classic Hinkley quarter of doing everything except finishing it off. We’ve all seen it enough times, that if you’d had a gun put against your head at 3 quarter time and said pick the result or you’re gone, most would have picked a close loss due to the poor kicking and walked out still breathing.Our forward line tonight nowhere near good enough
What’s the difference here….
He was let go 3 years later.
For all the carry on about technicalities of free kicks/out of bounds and play ons, there was an instance in the last quarter where sidebottom had the ball over the boundary line. A Throw in was called and sidebottom then proceeds to run into play and shove the ball into a Port player.
Under 18:10.2 C) this should have been a free kick to Port for not handing the ball to the boundary umpire or dropping it at the boundary.
Would love to see that mind numbingly selective twat has the umpire made the right call review that one.