This is pretty funny ..
Review Round 19, 2023 vs Collingwood
- Thread starter Marmozet
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Jun 7, 2015
- 7,557
- 15,031
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Watching the game last night I did wonder a few times, does the Dissent rule apply to Collingwood or only the non-boxoffice clubs?
Yup, he's been off all season. What's worse though is his weapon, his kicking, doesn't have the same impact it used to. He had a great opportunity yesterday, one which he should have converted given his skills.
He's had a few this season where he can't hit the target.
You can under the rules if you run in one direction off the line of the mark.
AS I understand it the difference between the Aliir (changes direction in running off the line of the mark and so is called out of bounds) and Elliott (moves in one direction off the line of the mark and so was called play on) decisions. It's subtle but I think its there.
Last edited:
Nah, they showed it and it was definitely a mark. Full control inside field of play
We had a few that could have been paid but didn't. McKenzie, SPP etc had a few meltdowns that could easily have been 50.
Yep. He's been doing a lot of slow running drills away from the main group at training and you can see he is under duress during them.
My guess is an ongoing hip or groin issue that has hampered him all season.
Cousin of Daicos
HEY MAGPIE ARMY!
You literally did tank that one. Which shocked me at the time. I couldn’t understand it myself. I honestly thought you all here would be pissed at that more than anything else
Giving up the Carlton game for free could cost you top 2
You gave us a free hit at you and I have no idea why.
Ford Fairlane
Moderator
- Feb 21, 2002
- 82,756
- 204,403
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
- Moderator
- #710
You can under the rules if you run in one direction off the line of the mark.
AS I understand it the difference between the Aliir (changes direction in running off the line of the mark and so is called out of bounds) and Elliott (moves in one direction off the line of the mark and so was called play on) decisions. It's subtle but I think its there.
And they both do it. Elliott was off the line of his mark from the outset because he cribbed to the right as he walked back. So both should have been called. End of the day it changes nothing.
- Mar 17, 2014
- 3,947
- 4,840
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
But if you're in the middle of the ground and take half a step to the side it's play on.You can under the rules if you run in one direction off the line of the mark.
AS I understand it the difference between the Aliir (changes direction in running off the line of the mark and so is called out of bounds) and Elliott (moves in one direction off the line of the mark and so was called play on) decisions. It's subtle but I think its there.
Thought The board gone a bit negative, We kick straight we win. A foward game plan gave us oppurtunity to score we just couldn't execute.
A few Points not mentioned.
- Love Williams but not suitable as sub
-Mckenzie on Elliot was weird decision early on and hurt
A few Points not mentioned.
- Love Williams but not suitable as sub
-Mckenzie on Elliot was weird decision early on and hurt
Boak is absolutely done.
Wines fall from grace has been astounding
Should be dropped for Jackson or Sinn.
Wines fall from grace has been astounding
Should be dropped for Jackson or Sinn.
Think I just threw up in my mouth a little
Weird that we are in a situation where the Captain and Vice Captain are in such rubbish form. Some tough choices about leadership next year.
manureid
Laziest Poster on Figbooty
Marshall a huge concern. He was a complete non entity
jdeezy
Premiership Player
- Jul 6, 2013
- 4,852
- 13,588
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Thought this myself. Cox was waving his arms around arguing about this call for ages, well after the free had been taken. As far as other decisions have gone this year that one has to be paid. Is the standard now that this is NOT dissent? That's fine by me, you have to allow the players to get wrapped up in the game and show emotion, but it needs to remain consistent.
pastmyprimus
Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
Port Adelaide - Allir Allir Player Sponsor 2021
Port Adelaide - Kane Farrell Player Sponsor 2021
Port Adelaide - Zak Butters 2019 Player Sponsor
Port Adelaide - Jack Watts Player Sponsor 2018
Port Adelaide - Jesse Palmer Player Sponsor 2017
Port Adelaide - Riley Bonner Player Sponsor 2016
Port Adelaide - Nathan Krakouer Player Sponsor 2015
From memory Dixon missed last week's game because of an injury he picked up/made worse when he was thrown in the ruck, after an awkward landing in a ruck contest. The same thing happened last night while rucking in the last qtr after the Lycett substitution. He was limping badly in that qtr. Just don't risk playing in that position. He looks proppy enough without risking further injury
- Jun 7, 2015
- 7,557
- 15,031
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Think about our two games before the Carlton one.
They were also very ordinary.
I genuinely thought we were done for the year, and expected a 10 goal loss last night.
Was pleasantly surprised that we were able to switch it back on.
If we play like last night for the rest of the season we will remain second, if we don't then we deserve to fail.
I am a lot more optimistic about Port after last night's game.
Next is the Showdown, then Geelong away, a lot will be decided by then.
We failed to capitalise on our advantages in the 3rd quarter and you made the most of that.
Enjoy the chocolates, see you in September.
Watching the replay again and I think this is a bad bad loss. Sugar coat it all you want but this was a near full strength team, at home in front of a huge crowd. Regardless that it finished within two points, we want to win a flag, these are the games we need to win. I’m worried for the next few weeks, absolutely don’t want Brisbane at the Gabba in the first week of the finals. Wines, Lycett and Marshall all out of form. Plus the bottoms 5 players not contributing. Hello darkness my old friend playing in the background.
bomberclifford
Importer/Exporter
Has been for several weeks and very little has been said about it.
In isolation, last night’s loss wasn’t too bad. But in the wider context, it was horrendous. We clearly rolled the dice on players who are stuck together with tape and came up wanting. When combined with the previous week and the recurring themes in losses like this, it really sucked.
- Aug 15, 2015
- 38,675
- 92,402
Yeah I have no idea with the Carlton game. It was crazy. 7 changes and then played like we dgaf.
Oh well. Hope you embarrass those campaigners next Friday night
Is there any correlation between his form drop off & being told to watch the head knocks?
Under the letter of the law the umpire is right both times but seriously how many times does the Aliir incident happen and is ignored.You can under the rules if you run in one direction off the line of the mark.
AS I understand it the difference between the Aliir (changes direction in running off the line of the mark and so is called out of bounds) and Elliott (moves in one direction off the line of the mark and so was called play on) decisions. It's subtle but I think its there.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
