petits
Team Captain
- Feb 8, 2022
- 420
- 483
- AFL Club
- GWS
I couldn't find much tbh. Are you thinking perhaps of Q-angle? That's the one that's different between men and women and has been attributed as a cause of increased ACL injuries.There is a bit of pseudo-science to it as correlation does not equal causation, and it isn't like they can make someone bow-legged to test the theory.
Plenty of information (from both reliable and unreliable sources) with a quick google search
Bowleggedness is a medical condition/deformity that affects ~1% of the population per a quick search, seems unlikely to affect many of the women.
What's annoying about the ACL concern trolling (this is not aimed at you Mitchell btw) is this underlying assumption that one arbitrary injury rate (the current male one) is fine and acceptable, but any increase on any particular limb = intolerable. And then the conclusion, always waiting to pop out, that women shouldn't play this/that/any sport, as if they aren't independent agents who can decide for themselves.
At the end of the day, ACL injuries are painful and annoying for athletes because the recovery is so long, but they don't risk your ability to later lead a full, satisfying life outside of sport - unlike head and spinal injuries. It will be great to continue lowering the rate of ACL injuries, but I don't feel uncomfortable with people choosing to take that risk now.
Last edited: