Round 21 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Finished 2266

With a bloody donut that was completely avoidable. Bloody Ziebell trade in!

Could have been a good score!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

One of my opponents has him so I'm not complaining but he definitely seems to be getting screwed going by his DT score compared to his SC score.
A better system would be use DT scores as the benchmark and just add or subtract some points at the end for disposal efficiency. Last night Jetta was atrocious and he scored close to his dt score, how if WHE is half his dt and at 90%? No way hes doing as bad as Jetta was last night. Gagf cd jokers
 
Last edited:
21/2150

Good: Kreuzer, Heeney, Danger, Kelly, Adams all 130s which is nice, and I won my league and am through to the QFs (after I got whacked back with a 2530 last week)

Bad: Sloane, Laird, Doc, Kade - all giving me nothing. Premos, yeah right.

Ugly: Gawn, Dahl, Macrae - kiss my rosey cheeks

****ing disgusting: Luke Ryan :mad:
 
I scored 1953 thanks to a donut and shit scores below 70 from 8 other players, my lowest score this year apart from the bye rounds.

Got knocked out in both my semis although I did somehow manage to win a semi for a minor premiership which is some small consolation.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I scored 1953 thanks to a donut and shit scores below 70 from 8 other players, my lowest score this year apart from the bye rounds.

Got knocked out in both my semis although I did somehow manage to win a semi for a minor premiership which is some small consolation.
Wasn't your teams predicted score 2400+?
 
Thank **** I'm no longer in any games next week. I can watch footy and not have to worry about match ups. The only ******* week where my POD players outscore the opposition by a lot is when I have 3 God damn ******* donuts.

Gagf you shit house campaigner of a game.

Finished on 2836, I mean 1836. Worst score of the year besides byes. I blame useless campaigners zerrett, selwood and jpk.
 
Last edited:
Mad if you don't take it. 132 is a good score. Regardless of what you think Danger could score if you've been presented with a decent VC score you should take it.

Kelly scored 20 above his average for the year. If you didn't think you would be happy with that then why did you VC him in the first place?
I took Kelly's score and ended up losing by 6 points

upload_2017-8-13_19-48-31.png
 
Well suck me sideways and call me Beryl, after a very nervous last quarter of the port game where i needed 60 out of Ryder, Shaz and Treloar i knew it would come down to scaling. After the score came through straight after the game i was up by 3 with scaling still to come.

The end result, i get up by 1 point and am off to the prelims now babeh **** yeeeeeeeaha!! I bloody love this game,
 
Hey guys. Had 3 emergencies on my bench (Mountford: 41, Pickett: 51, Deluca: 67). I had a 0 on my field. When they have added the emergencies score to my total, they have taken Mountford's 41. Is this right? Shouldn't they have taken Deluca's score?
 
2226 but I won my cashie, woo fuggen hooo!!!!



giphy.gif


tenor.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top