Game Day Round 3 Discussion

[Silky23]

I’m in strife now.

Darcy > DC nets me 112k but if I trade Hopper for either of JZ/Setterfield I can’t get Baker’s 95.

If I hold Hopper there’s no way I can get any of Setterfield/JZ/Worpel. Best I could do is Bowes.

 

[hsaklag]

Does anyone think I should bench Ginbey to take Wilmot's 69?

Feels small-cholled

Ginbey literally listed as first follower. He'll go 150 minimum

 

[mochacinolatte]

I’m in strife now.

Darcy > DC nets me 112k but if I trade Hopper for either of JZ/Setterfield I can’t get Baker’s 95.

If I hold Hopper there’s no way I can get any of Setterfield/JZ/Worpel. Best I could do is Bowes.

Ditch the Darcy trade. Cop the 40k decrease. More valuable getting the midpricers that are must haves.

 

[Jellyball]

Why does it list the outs (sub) but never the ins? Should have to declare it with your initial team selection.

 

[A Bit Dusty]

Does anyone think I should bench Ginbey to take Wilmot's 69?

Feels small-cholled

 

[marcmurphy3]

I’m in strife now.

Darcy > DC nets me 112k but if I trade Hopper for either of JZ/Setterfield I can’t get Baker’s 95.

If I hold Hopper there’s no way I can get any of Setterfield/JZ/Worpel. Best I could do is Bowes.

I would keep Hopper rather then trading him out for any of those guys if he is your only option. He'll be just as good or go close.

Keep him and take Bakers 95 this week as a bonus.

 

[Jellyball]

Harsh on brodie. At least puts on defensive pressure with 6 and 5 tackles in his games. Im starting to think longmuire is seriously brain dead.

Brings in jackson instead of a fwd when you're losing a 40 goal kicker in lobb on huge dollars which will lead darcy to leave soon IMO. So the whole thing is basically pointless. Trades logue who is a great defender. Plays fyfe as a fwd. Talks like his a zombie with no emotion in his pressers.

 

[Silky23]

Ditch the Darcy trade. Cop the 40k decrease. More valuable getting the midpricers that are must haves.

Issue is, I have no way of accumulating the cash to get there. That is the only way I'm getting the required money.



Picture for opinion purposes.

 

[Snake Charmer]

Baker with a big score.. thank you

 

[Petrify]

Issue is, I have no way of accumulating the cash to get there. That is the only way I'm getting the required money.

View attachment 1645388

Picture for opinion purposes.

Found your problem

 

[pincrusher]

Lots to catch up on.

Good to have a decent VC score locked away in the first match of the round. (Pommy).

Who is more of a must have? Daicos, or Cameron? Thoughts please. Can only get one. Had to trade out Gawn and my other trade will be to get Cheezels.

 

[vanders]

These are my options:

Kent is not the sub:

• Cowan on field
• Cole on DEF bench so don’t get his score
• Ginbey DEF
• Kent mid
• Get Bakers score

Kent is the sub

• Cowan on field
• Cole in DEF
• Ginbey MID
• Kent DEF bench

Or the 3rd and scariest option

• Cole DEF
• Cowan bench
• Ginbey DEF
• Kent MID and if he’s sub I move Chesser on field in the MIDs

 

[Silky23]

Found your problem

View attachment 1645395

Yep but how do I muster up enough cash to do anything. Only 15k in the bank.

Pedlar > Chandler gets me 65k and then nobody available to do anything after that.

Darcy > DC gets me 115k, but then again what do I do with 285k. As stated, Bowes the only option at that point.

 

[Choppers]

Big chance Constable is sub. It won't be Chol or Berry and Sexton was sub last week.

Plus GC has selected 2 half backs coming off long term injuries with minimal match preparation. They could see Constable sub as insurance.

Can't take the risk of looping him given GC play a day after carlton so no chance to swap to Cowan.

The 2's play 10.25am Sunday, so you'll get a better idea then as to who's playing...so check the VFL teams then

 

[Silky23]

My thinking now is Darcy > DC, go Pedlar > Bowes and just sit on the team a week.

Happy to go early on Bowes. Think he will be a ripper pick, issue is I'm losing a lot of cash generation ability

 

[pincrusher]

The 2's play 10.25am Sunday, so you'll get a better idea then as to who's playing...so check the VFL teams then

Noticed that, but most will need to make the decision tomorrow.

 

[Petrify]

Darcy > DC gets me 115k, but then again what do I do with 285k. As stated, Bowes the only option at that point.

I'm excited to get Bowes into my team in a few weeks. Don't think there's too much risk going early on him. Cats midfield is woeful, he'll score well

 

[PoopingHindi]

I’m forced into starting Cowan.
Gonna roll the dice on Constable being dropped. Davey or Chesser are my back up plan depending on when we get the info.
death riding Mackenzie.
What could go wrong…apart from all of it?

 

[Suma Magic]

Sounds like we won’t know if Constable is sub.

I guess I’ll put Cowan on field and Wilmot’s score won’t count.

Clubs should legally have to name their sub if one of their emergencies has >5% ownership.

 

[JuddgementDay]

My thinking now is Darcy > DC, go Pedlar > Bowes and just sit on the team a week.

Happy to go early on Bowes. Think he will be a ripper pick, issue is I'm losing a lot of cash generation ability

Unless you want to do more drastic options

 

[Maybe Tomorrow]

Yep but how do I muster up enough cash to do anything. Only 15k in the bank.

Pedlar > Chandler gets me 65k and then nobody available to do anything after that.

Darcy > DC gets me 115k, but then again what do I do with 285k. As stated, Bowes the only option at that point.

$185k gets Chesser to Worpel?

 

[Suma Magic]

Gold Coast are really out of line here with this whole Constable fiasco.

 

[gutsroy]

He knows how to find the ball, so he'll rack it up in the 2s. And the AFL side will lose more games, so changes will happen. Just need him to avoid the sub, come back in in a few weeks time and make it to $250k.

But he's still a chance to be the E, no? And Sunday game, awkward as.

 

[marcmurphy3]

Issue is, I have no way of accumulating the cash to get there. That is the only way I'm getting the required money.

View attachment 1645388

Picture for opinion purposes.

You have a guns and rookies structure which makes it harder to fit in those midpricers without tearing your team apart. If you wanted to be conservative you could almost do nothing. Aside from Pedlar your team looks pretty decent.

If you wanted to be more aggressive however you could go

Out: Darcy, Kelly, Pedlar
In: Cameron, Setterfield, Ziebell Plus about 70k

Its 2 keepers for 2 keeps but that combination will get you about 20-30 points extra per round plus massively increase your team value in coming weeks.

Alternatively you could go

Out: Darcy, Docherty, Pedlar
In: Cameron, Daicos, Ziebell plus about 25k

This combination won't rise by as much in value but will get you 3 keepers for 2 and get you 30-40 points extra per round.

 

[Battlepants]

Sounds like we won’t know if Constable is sub.

I guess I’ll put Cowan on field and Wilmot’s score won’t count.

Clubs should legally have to name their sub if one of their emergencies has >5% ownership.

This might sound crazy but... is there any reason they can't name their sub at the same time as the rest of their team sheets?