Keefe to Murphy?
Are you worried about piggy hibbie?
Am seriously thinking about the first trade.
I might hold Hibberd considering DEF Rookies like Campdown Races and Finlayson are punching above their weight and more or less covering for him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Keefe to Murphy?
Are you worried about piggy hibbie?
Your team looks pretty strong.
If you wanted to take a risk you could trade Zorko and Bont to Dusty and Danger. It would break some golden rules of supercoach, but if there are some stud rookies this year, it may mean that not as many trades are needed as some years. This could mean that the winner is the guy who focuses on points early.
I will wait on team sections Re hibbo dees need to drop some of those half back potatoes so piggy can feast.Am seriously thinking about the first trade.
I might hold Hibberd considering DEF Rookies like Campdown Races and Finlayson are punching above their weight and more or less covering for him.
Pretty good team.
I agree dump Bont and I add Zorko as well.
Maybe, look at Martin, Oliver, Selwood and Parker.
I would, I am waiting for Danger to drop and get a war chest and get him later.
Hey campaigners.
If want advice is is easier for posters to help if you post your team and cash balance.
Woooo!!!Silly Sicily given a week.
I'm thinking the same. I think it sounds like a good plan. Or at least it does at first thought.
Appreciate anyone's thoughts on my plans. Basically it's to focus on getting the top guys in. I think with some awesome rookies that this approach could pay off.
I need to trade Libba, and want Mitchell really badly. My team is below, and I have 80k.
Libba -> Mitchell would leave me needing $138.9k.
I feel like Hibberd to Bonner is the best way to get this cash. Everyone else is doing their job well enough. This would leave me with 149k.
I'm not convinced, appreciate any feedback on this approach, or on other ideas.
View attachment 478360
How would people rank these 3 on bringing them in this week:
- Bonner
- Coniglio
- Ryan (WCE)
Depends on your team.How would people rank these 3 on bringing them in this week:
- Bonner
- Coniglio
- Ryan (WCE)
Hey Suma,
I have almost the same dilemma as you needing to get rid of Libba with $81K in bank (don't have Hibberd though).
Thinking of trading my worst DEF (Sicily) to Bonner to free up the cash to get Libba to Dusty.
An alternative to this could be Libba to RGray with just 1 trade via a Heeney, Walters etc. Don't know if you've thought of that?
How would people rank these 3 on bringing them in this week:
- Bonner
- Coniglio
- Ryan (WCE)
WOW! Youre crying over 6 extra points? Hahah. And you took this much time to research possession by possession? Hahahahahahha. Thats embarassing as shit.I'm glad you asked about points, scaling and weighing. My exact argument is that Martin has been scaled up for no good reason, and it shows in his score.
Lets look at Dustys HT to FT SC scores.
1st Half: DT: 80, SC: 84
Stats: Kicks - 13, HB 4, MK 2, Tackle 3, Goals 3, CP 9, CL 6, Clanger 1, DE 70, FF -, FA 1
2nd Half: DT: 47, SC 76
Stats: Kicks - 6, HB 2, MK, 1, Tackle 4, Goals 2, CP 5, CL 1, Clanger 3, DE 87.5, FF -, FA 2
Supercoach 84 | 76
Disposals 17 | 8
Kicks 13 | 6
Handballs 4 | 2
Marks 2 | 1
Tackles 3 | 4
Goals 3 | 2
CP 9 | 5
Clearances 6 | 1
Clanger 1 | 3
DE 70 | 88
Free Against 1 | 2
Now lets go through each of those touches.
Q3. 5 Possessions - 29.5 SC points (should've been 21.5 SC points) - Tigers lose qtr by 10 points
Possession 1 (3 points)
Contested possession (intercepts crow handball) - 3 points
Kick to contest (short) (centre clearance) - 0 points
Possession 2 (9.5 points)
Uncontested handball receive - 1.5 points
Long effective kick to i50 - 5 points
Score assist - 3 points
Possession 3 (4.5 points)
Uncontested handball receive - 1.5 points
Effective kick (short) - 3 points
Tackle (4 points)
Watch the replay, they call this a tackle on CEY and its clearly not. Shouldn't have gotten points for this
Free Against (-4 points)
One Percenter/Turnover (8 points)
Tackle - 4 points - once again, this wasn't a tackle
Knock on to advantage - 4 points
Possession 4 (4.5 points)
Uncontested handball receive - 1.5 point
Effective kick (short) - 3 points
Q4. 5 Possessions - 40 SC points (should've been 32 SC points)- Tigers lose qtr by 14 points
Possession 5 (13 points)
Contested mark I50 - 4 points
Kick - 3 points
Goal - 6 points (Score after goal - 91 v 75)
Tackle (4 points)
Third non tackle he is given points for, he TOUCHES CEY's arm and that counts as a tackle apparently
Possession 6 (10.5 points)
Uncontested handball receive - 1.5 point
Kick - 3 points
Goal - 6 points (Score after goal - 91 v 82)
Possession 7 (3 points)
Uncontested handball receive - 1.5 point
Effective handball - 1.5 point
Tackle (4 points)
Fourth non-tackle award points, he touches CEY's hips as CEY handballs/falls to the ground
Free Against (0 points)
Hardball Get - 4 points
FA - -4 points
Possession 8 (5.5 points)
Looseball Get - 4 points
Effective handball - 1.5 point
Conclusion:
I can only seem to find 70 SC points for Dusty's second half according to the AFL statistics and their replays. Once you adjust for the three incorrect tackles it should've been 54 points. Yet amazingly he ended up with 76 points for the half!
Now sure, you can argue that the score of his first half contributed to the second half via scaling. And that is a legitimate argument, however, given he was also gifted 16 points from non-existent tackles in one half alone and the fact the Tigers got pumped by 36 and it doesn't appear his second half score had much scaling go the other way I don't buy it.
Remember he had a +33 DT/SC game differential, when other Tigers who had great first halves weren't scaled up by similarly crazy amounts (e.g. Nankervis +10 , Caddy -1). Match winners Josh Jenkins (+1 DT/SC) and Laird (-21 DT/SC) didn't receive super scaling, Dusty's direct opponent CEY copped it hard (-24 DT/SC).
So yes, a +22 SC point half on what he should've scored seems completely off, and that isn't even looking at the first half of the game.
Don't worry though, definitely all in my head and 100% NOT KOTD