He was still very good but slightly off his best, as seen with his running into an open goal and spraying it.Who said Nick was s**t?
He doesn't deserve the 3 votes, Cam Rayner had more impact on the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He was still very good but slightly off his best, as seen with his running into an open goal and spraying it.Who said Nick was s**t?
If a person released footage of a naked AFLW player you know who would be the subject of outrage and disgust? The creep who released the private footage. But when blokes are betrayed they are flayed by the media as dumb morons and the scum who betrayed them are either ignored or rewarded.For those keeping score, Tarryn Thomas is in trouble for using a naked shot and threatening to distribute it, Crisp in trouble for having someone do that to him. AFLW players are fine with molesting rookie players in public but Crisp isn't for doing it in private. Yeah, he's been a dickhead but by what standards can these people complain?
Maybe I have. But in the heat of the game, that's what I saw. Obviously others thought he was great. Perhaps the truth lies somewhere in the middle.So a player, recruited as a “role” player, plays his “role” , but that’s not good enough.
I think you’ve got that wrong.
Good to see AJ respond well to the Robert Walls call. Gives us an extra weapon when needed. He was more than serviceable and I think won some important clearances.McStay was not recruited as a ruckman… can’t understand the hate…
Cameron was performing great until he went down. Cox was great for a chop out.
Not much you can do when your 1 and 2 ruck go down.
McStay was recruited as a forward.
Aside from those 2 missed goals he was great. 151 ranking points also, best by 30.He was still very good but slightly off his best, as seen with his running into an open goal and spraying it.
He doesn't deserve the 3 votes, Cam Rayner had more impact on the game.
We do play them again at the G.
He was still very good but slightly off his best, as seen with his running into an open goal and spraying it.
He doesn't deserve the 3 votes, Cam Rayner had more impact on the game.
You havin' a laugh? Daicos must have had 35 and kicked 2. Goodness, gracious me!Ok, not a great surprise, expected Brisbane to be better. Our goal kicking was poor but there were so many signs that we were off tonight.
Nic Daicos had a shocker by his standards.
It was a very predictable outcome. The week of criticism of Daniher and Hipwood. The Lions being questioned and called pretenders once again. Playing at their little fortress against a depleted and over hyped Collingwood. Colour me shocked.One bad, undisciplined quarter.
Aside from that, the effort was there and we played some okay footy. Just felt Brisbane were up for it tonight and we were slightly off the pace.
A good reality check, moving on…..
I disagree, I reckon he did alright... but I’m far from an expertDid you? So did 6 others who gave you a like. You may have more supporters. I thought Frampton was all at sea much of the time in defence. He looked like he was too intent on playing a role in a structure at the expense of being an effective defender. He wasn't alone nor helped by defenders who were meant to be keeping an eye on Cameron.
He'd have to be in the votes. Reckon Cameron will get 3.He is 20 years old in his second year and just had 38 and kicked 2 goals. People on here are so harsh.
He'd have to be in the votes. Reckon Cameron will get 3.
Reef out for Ruscoe. Frampton into the ruck.
Carlton: C. Judd 3 votes.Maybe 1 or 2. If he was Cripps he'd get the 3 votes.
I suppose they aren't thinking clearly when they are stoned or pissed. It's the utter low lives who leak this crap who should be tarred and feathered.I'm going to court unpopularity by suggesting he brought the media focus upon himself. Surely these players realise the danger of leaving online a visual insight into the seedier side of their lives?
DeGoey and Jaicos were both serviceable / solid. They had 21 and 23 touches.Ah well Chin up we get a 10 day break.
Ash fought well and showed he has a great fighting spirit despite his opponent.
Bobby Hill and Naics true shining lights.
Unexpectedly quieter games from Jaicos, DeGoey, Adams, Crisp and Mitchell not ideal and timing terrible.
But - as pointed out - we win nearly all the stats. Kick straight and we win.
I feel like we’ll do better in gather round even vs a red hot saints outfit.
C JuddMaybe 1 or 2. If he was Cripps he'd get the 3 votes.
Johnson, Bobby, N Daicos, Maynard, Mihochek and probably Murphy were good. Johnson was a genuine positive. It's not his fault we lost.Good to see AJ respond well to the Robert Walls call. Gives us an extra weapon when needed. He was more than serviceable and I think won some important clearances.
Crisp was diabolical. Probably should not have played.DeGoey and Jaicos were both serviceable / solid. They had 21 and 23 touches.
We had more scoring shots , more inside 50’s matched them in clearance, just didn’t finish off our work. Missed half a dozen sitters, mainly from one of our best kicks Elliot.
Sidebottom , Adams, Mitchell all poor tonight.
McCreery , Quaynor very fumbly.
McStay no impact. Johnson good. Noble still a worry with his ball use.
Maynard, Pendles, Mihocek pretty good returns from them.
Never easy to win up there.
He is 20 years old in his second year and just had 38 and kicked 2 goals. People on here are so harsh.