Round 5 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah I'll stick the C on dusty I think. Melbourne have no match up for him when he goes forward. He should bag a few goals as well as running through the middle most of the game
Stick Hibberd on him. Hibberd is doing SFA anyhow!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Also, Guelfi the potential trade-in for a sneaky Fritzl out to avoid Garlett score, but not 100% sure JS-wise. Interested to see what others reckon there.
 
Tiger time fellas

Dusty C
Gawn

Already had Fritsch on the bench so not a big deal.

My team is full cooked already though, SC ****ing sucks, at least the Tiges are good so I don't totally hate footy.
 
... at least the Tiges are good so I don't totally hate footy.
Wait a few more hours. After being a Tiges supporter for over 40 years I know better than to make calls like that.
 
Wait a few more hours. After being a Tiges supporter for over 40 years I know better than to make calls like that.
Tiges have only lost 3 games that I've been too in the last 5 years, all of which were prelims, we're playing Melbourne so this definitely isn't a finals game...

Before last year I would of had the same wariness going into a game as you, but now the footy can't make me sad anymore :)
 
Also, Guelfi the potential trade-in for a sneaky Fritzl out to avoid Garlett score, but not 100% sure JS-wise. Interested to see what others reckon there.

I think his JS is pretty good - of course, I don't know how Woosh/the selection panel sees it which is often a long way divorced from how I do.

Our obvious best 22 players out at the moment are Fantasia, McKenna and Gleeson. Ambrose, Colyer and Laverde are borderline. None of those players are pure midfielders and I doubt would be in-line to take Guelfi's spot (the only danger I see there is McKenna pushing McGrath back to the middle which could impact Guelfi). Langford should be in the team and playing in the midfield but for whatever reason is out of favour. I'd also argue that he should take Myers' spot anyway.

His first game was very impressive, particularly the way he built into it which can be rare for younger players who have a tendency to fade out. I want to bring him in, and I particularly want to do it this week to avoid Gartlett's score, BUT I just can't bring myself to do it. I think another look at Guelfi (particularly on the bigger H&A stage that there is) is invaluable and (more importantly) it is not Fritsch I want to turf for him, but that 21 scoring potato in Gartlett. Fritsch has a low B/E and I reckon is nailed on to come back for the Sunday game against us.
 
Can't even captain fault Gawnbot because I've had Olango on all year. Time to out the hail mary on Hypetracca.

6387fd4005ca1dd886292f5947ff4a5e.gif
 
Zorko plummeting in value killing his owners, but bloke will bottom out at an extremely tasty price for those who like to live dangerously.
You'd want to see him work his way through a tag first, though, I guess.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Zorko plummeting in value killing his owners, but bloke will bottom out at an extremely tasty price for those who like to live dangerously.
You'd want to see him work his way through a tag first, though, I guess.
Will bottom out at around 450k. Could be a good M9 loophole because of his massive ceiling.
 
Nobody should be paying more than $200k for a bench player. Stick a for in him. He's cooked.
He would be fielded 2 games through the byes and then will be a great loophole M9 after that (If he is tagged he stays bench, If he isnt he will go big and loop his score). Went 109+ 16 times last year with scores like 196, 143 & 142.

Cash flow wont totally dry up. Should be able to get 2 or 3 fallen premos on bench and not just rookies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top