Trades Round 5 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last night they have saints training before 360.

They weren't doing a hell of alot .

Most of the time these players get up to play .
Yeah I often wonder how much training AFL players do in season. They seem to put such a high value on gaining fitness in the preseason, and it's a sport where they cover so much ground and must expend so much energy in a match it can't be much.
 
Yeah I often wonder how much training AFL players do in season. They seem to put such a high value on gaining fitness in the preseason, and it's a sport where they cover so much ground and must expend so much energy in a match it can't be much.
Which is exactly why there’s a big ??? against Neale’s ability to come back to 100% this year
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yeah I often wonder how much training AFL players do in season. They seem to put such a high value on gaining fitness in the preseason, and it's a sport where they cover so much ground and must expend so much energy in a match it can't be much.

I think most of the heavy lifting is done in the preseason .
They will get some light weeks duing the year .

RnR before the next game .
 
Which is exactly why there’s a big ??? against Neale’s ability to come back to 100% this year

Neale "I'm in the best sharp I've even been in "

Some kents think he hurt it in the cats game .

It's a mystery.
 
Unless he has a few weeks off definitely. Silly campaigner probably thinks he's going to win another Brownlow so can't afford to miss matches.

Prob hurt himself in the gym .

God he's going to be dirt cheap soon.
 
Butters > Cerra
Sharp/Highmore > L.Jones

And enjoy your donut in defence :moustache:

Also, stop with the sideways trades man, in fact no more trades for a few weeks!

They're not sideways they're "upgrades" :sob:

Think i should skip waterman then?





i'm laughing on the outside but i'm really crying on the inside
 
Thinking of going
Butters to Impey
Helmet to Ridley.

Not ideal bringing in Impey at the higher price but most of the forwards are untrustworthy so I figure id take the cheaper option and get in Ridley now while I have the chance.

Or is it not worth trading out Helmet? In that case, I'd probably still go Impey then just bank the cash and use the 200k I would have left next week to upgrade one of the rookies.

Screen Shot 2021-04-15 at 14.15.29.png
 
They're not sideways they're "upgrades" :sob:

Think i should skip waterman then?





i'm laughing on the outside but i'm really crying on the inside
I assume you mean Butters to Waterman? You could, but your main risk now is not completing your side. If you downgrade Butters, you then have to upgrade Waterman at some point. So that's 2 trades to get back to the same point.

I don't think Waterman is a must have, Jones is much more useful to you as you need defenders. You will have to be strong and hold Helmet even as his value drops.

You have basically used all you luxury trades for the season already imo.

Edit: looking at your team again you could do Butters > Impey to get a bit of cash in the bank. You would be trading him in as a keeper though.
 
Last edited:
Out Butters

In one of

Bolton v Cerra v Noah Anderson
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

All things considered, including price, breakevens, role, etc who would we go out of Jiath and Bowes? Both speak to me, if CJ ends up a keeper the 100k saving is immense, but I'm worried that getting him lateish as I am now he might just end up being an extra trade. Bowes I feel is more likely to be a keeper but am I spending that extra cash for nothing?

I have Lloyd, Ridley, Houston and Doch already in the backline so the wildcard question is are there any other Backman to consider over those two?

I've pondered this too.

Depends on the make up of your team. If you're sitting pretty rank wise with no major issues and can afford Bowes without hurting future trade plans go Bowes. His role is better role than CJ with kick outs, 500k for 115 average is a no brainer. I am gonna bring him in I reckon.

Will be a keeper and average 10+ over Jiath all year. I think he might fall back to a 105 average but at the same time I expect Jiath to fall back to 90-95.

CJ is higher risk/higher reward because you're potentially saving a trade with the 100k or losing a trade down the line to move Jiath on for a real premium. If I was playing catch up I'd go CJ and 100k to fix other issues.
 
Hey lads,

Fixing up my team a little, plan is to hold Daniel for the week and hope he bounces back & I also avoid the extra trade. Any other suggestions, 51k cash.

Butters > Ridley (via Dow & Sharp)
Dow > Waterman

View attachment 1103075
Nice trades in your situation.
 
Out Butters

In one of

Bolton v Cerra v Noah Anderson
Cerra only in 4% of teams, which is amazing. Anderson would be a massive POD all year probably. Bolton strikes me as the type that will go 35, 110, 60 and drive you mad.
 
This isn't entirely unexpected.

Don't trade Flynn yet as he has a heap more cash to make. Will Treacy make you that same coin over the same period? Look to get Treacy in next week if he looks ok this weekend.

Have you got Waterman already? Looks like he could make 150k at his price.
Treacy of course is a good R3 should there be a Rowan Marshall F5/6 in a few weeks time.
 
Butters was the right choice.

Injurys are unlucky .
That's why it destroyed my enthusiasm

I make more than enough dumb choices to not need to be ****ed over by bad luck :cryv1::cryv1:
 
All things considered, including price, breakevens, role, etc who would we go out of Jiath and Bowes? Both speak to me, if CJ ends up a keeper the 100k saving is immense, but I'm worried that getting him lateish as I am now he might just end up being an extra trade. Bowes I feel is more likely to be a keeper but am I spending that extra cash for nothing?

I have Lloyd, Ridley, Houston and Doch already in the backline so the wildcard question is are there any other Backman to consider over those two?
Laird or Short, if money allows
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top