- Feb 2, 2020
- 4,172
- 10,744
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it’s only one you hold surely?Hope Cripps is out so we don't have to make a decision ffs
Did you just assume my speciesAre you and Here2tellyouwhy the same person? Kind of move that he’d make sober or drunk
Did you just assume my chol sizeI feel like Here2tellyouwhy and I are complete opposites lol. He is a magnificent kentie who must still be hung over from his weekend
My chol is far to small for such a move.
AFL is a jokeRyder gone for 2. Hello Hayes.
UPDATE: Saints to challenge Ryder ban at Tribunal
The Match Review has completed its findings from Sunday's three matcheswww.afl.com.au
Lots of reasons for us to say this. The Ryder decision probably isn't one of themAFL is a joke
Yeah if that was Pickett Worsfold or G train etc he might be dead but Ryder isnt a sniper, he pulled up and braced not leant in and killed.Lots of reasons for us to say this. The Ryder decision probably isn't one of them
On first viewing yesterday I thought Ryder didn't do too much wrong. On second and third viewing I reckon it's a reasonable call. Saints can argue it if they want
Agree, but that's the big diff now to when those blokes were firin'.Yeah if that was Pickett Worsfold or G train etc he might be dead but Ryder isnt a sniper, he pulled up and braced not leant in and killed.
Two weeks is overkill.
Can see Cripps being touch and go all week, named then not playing this weekend and then another week of that BS as well
Yeah if that was Pickett Worsfold or G train etc he might be dead but Ryder isnt a sniper, he pulled up and braced not leant in and killed.
Two weeks is overkill.
No matter how many times I look at it I can't see he did anything wrong. He stopped moving and braced himself for the impact. He didn't bump. Day ran into him. In basketball a foul would have been called on Day for charging. Different game I know, but still an indication that Ryder was unlucky.Lots of reasons for us to say this. The Ryder decision probably isn't one of them
On first viewing yesterday I thought Ryder didn't do too much wrong. On second and third viewing I reckon it's a reasonable call. Saints can argue it if they want
Not worth a trade if he's a late withdrawal anyway. It would suggest that he'd only miss this week.Can see the shemozzle this week being Cripps named to play Sunday only to be withdrawn prior to kickoff to really screw with me. Leaves only Parish,Brayshaw and Titch at a stretch as potential replacements. Ideally Carlton would have played before Melbourne & St.Kilda to allow me to bring in Oliver/Steele should Crippa be withdrawn but alas the SuperCoach Gods ain’t on my side
You think? Depends how bad the injury is I guess doesn’t it. I know it’s been reported he escaped serious damage but how reliable is the info? From past experiences, including my own, hamstrings aren’t a simple 1 week and they’re back out on the park type deal. I hope I’m wrong though as I’d love to hold him. With my current rank and start to the season the decision to hold/trade becomes a big one. Him being named on the Fri or whenever it is only to be a late out makes it a tough one for sure. Being a late withdrawal prior to the game doesn’t always mean they are automatically playing the following week, I refer you to Hopper from GWS only a couple weeks ago for example.Not worth a trade if he's a late withdrawal anyway. It would suggest that he'd only miss this week.
Have to wait on news like you said, but even if he misses 2-3 games you will have burned a trade of a keeper that's otherwise averaging 130 and might not get much cheaper for the rest of the season.You think? Depends how bad the injury is I guess doesn’t it. I know it’s been reported he escaped serious damage but how reliable is the info? From past experiences, including my own, hamstrings aren’t a simple 1 week and they’re back out on the park type deal. I hope I’m wrong though as I’d love to hold him. With my current rank and start to the season the decision to hold/trade becomes a big one. Him being named on the Fri or whenever it is only to be a late out makes it a tough one for sure. Being a late withdrawal prior to the game doesn’t always mean they are automatically playing the following week, I refer you to Hopper from GWS only a couple weeks ago for example.
Very true.Have to wait on news like you said, but even if he misses 2-3 games you will have burned a trade of a keeper that's otherwise averaging 130 and might not get much cheaper for the rest of the season.
I'd focus on fixing other issues unless he is set for a reasonable stint on the sidelines.
Yep, decided pretty early on he was going the man and not the ball.Agree, but that's the big diff now to when those blokes were firin'.
Paddy didn't need to do it....but he chose to.
And you pay the price if he cops head trauma (intentional or not). Day will automatically be out for 12 days, because of this illegal act, so should Paddy imo.
.