Round 6 Trades

[Krujan]

With Waite back I can't see Rowe getting many games

Waite is ALWAYS an injury/suspension risk. Rowe won't have to wait long for another crack if history has taught us anything.

 

[Deliverance]

Yes i do see him as a top 6 def. Only player i can afford to bring in would be Dixon though? Is he worth a sideways trade to save a zero??

Problem is, he won't be tod 6 total points between now and the end of the year, compared to guys who aren't injured for the next 1-3 weeks. Gibbs is a gamble this week. If you hold and he's out for one, you win, if he's out for 3 you lose.

 

[the push up king]

saunders or corr......
and
bitchell, dixon or hartlett?

 

[rocker_oz33]

Still at a 100 bucks maybe nswCROW should buy this team
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/281099917023?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649

 

[Judd_Magic]

Can you afford Gibbs>Hartlett and Dangerfield>Watson? Personally I wouldn't be trading out either Gibbs or Dangerfield but I know you're trying to protect your overall position and can't afford to drop points.

Nah, don't have enough cash in the kitty mate.

Only have $41,000.

 

[hoddo]

Nah, don't have enough cash in the kitty mate.

Only have $41,000.

Probably for the best. I like your Rowe>Gawn trade much better

 

[DT_35]

Rowe or Blicavs > Gawn?

- Rowe not playing, Blicavs is.
- Rowe B/E only 16, Blicavs 44.
- Rowe can still make money if he gets a game
- Rowe is DPP
- I think Blicavs has probably maxed out

Hutchins > Vlastiun or Saunders?

- Both sub candidates
- Saunders cheaper

Thoughts?

 

[Feerits Elf]

Yarran has been in ripping form averaging 101 from his last 3 with a very soft draw for the next 5 weeks, don't know why you would be advising anyone against. He's been a superstar of the comp this year. Taken his game to a whole new level.

Because he's in my team, and Sod's Law means he is bound to fail very soon.

But really I think it's better to hold on to Fyfe.

 

[Fiasco]

Got 2 options here

Pittard + Goodes -> Hartlett + Saunders
+ 100k

Or

Pittard + M. Jones to Shaw + Saunders
This allows me to swap Saunders with Goodes in the backline so I keep Goodes on the midfield bench

Shaws the best defender I can afford in the 2nd option but I get to keep Goodes. I'm still a bit worried about Goddard being a late out tomorrow but nothing I can do about that.

 

[tracygrimshaw]

To trade:
Rowe or Dwyer?

 

[chrispaul3]

Looking at 1 of 2 options here and some advice/opinion would be appreciated...

OPTION 1
Saunders/N.Wright + Hartlett in

OPTION 2
Vlastuin + Dixon in

like the upside of Hartlett over Dixon
But with goodes and gibbs on the pine, need my downgrade ( saunders/wright/vlastuin) to play the next few rounds.

any opinion would be appreciated!
Cheers

 

[SSSSSS]

How are people getting Gawn into their forward line? Am I missing something?

 

[Feerits Elf]

^ Nah trading through a DPP

 

[The_Flying_Egg]

I traded Pittard for Saunders and turned Stevenson into Heath Shaw. Got a weak side this week with Fyfe, Gibbs and Goodes out, but I have a full side playing

 

[Patty Healey]

Birchall - Hartlett - Goddard - Stevenson - Terlich - Gibbs (Hutchins - Pittard)
Ablett - Pendles - Swan - Danger - Wines - Mayes - Lucas - O'Meara (Crouch - Goodes)
Maric - Leuenberger (Blicavs - Rowe)
Cox - A.Walker - Kennedy - Rockliff - Martin - Neade (Dwyer - Macaffer)

BOLD = OUT this week

Option A)
Blicavs > Gawn + Hutchins > Vlastiun

Option B)
Dwyer > Gawn (Via Rowe FWD) + Hutchins > Vlastiun
- That way when Gawn moos I Can upgrade him to prem FWD and move Rowe back to Rucks?

Thoughts? Any other options?

A >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B

 

[Pure_Ownage]

Rowe > Gawn and Pittard > H Shaw.

Means I lose my R/F link but I'll find a way to get that back later. All the other rookies on the bubble this week have very questionable JS so I think I have to get on Gawn.

 

[Patty Healey]

Rowe or Blicavs > Gawn?

- Rowe not playing, Blicavs is.
- Rowe B/E only 16, Blicavs 44.
- Rowe can still make money if he gets a game
- Rowe is DPP
- I think Blicavs has probably maxed out

Hutchins > Vlastiun or Saunders?

- Both sub candidates
- Saunders cheaper

Thoughts?

Vlaustin IMO, named on ball and should only improve from here. I know he s more expensive but I think he will be worth it.

 

[chillilovers]

I see a few folks trading out Danger.. Why? If I didn't have him I'd be buying him right now.

 

[SSSSSS]

^ Nah trading through a DPP

Does he end up going forward or staying in the ruck?

Here's my dilemma.

Trade out Hutchins > Saunders to avoid the Donut. Then Tex to Walker
Or

Rowe > Gawn for guaranteed cash. Then Tex to Walker

 

[Judd_Magic]

Decided to get Hartlett instead of Birchall now due to Hartlett playing as a pure mid.

A couple of teams I'm playing have Birchall so going for Hartlett now as a P.O.D

Plus Hartlett is set to go up $50k while Birchall won't hardly go up that much at all.

Will still be aiming to get Bircall in though soonish.

 

[Feerits Elf]

OK so go Tex out - Rowe to forwards - Gawn in (if you want).

That's how people are doing it.

 

[GotTheGoodes]

Why do you care if Hartlett is going up more than Birchall if you expect to keep either for the whole year JM?

 

[Feerits Elf]

He means whether they will be priced beyond him if he doesn't move now.

 

[Knighta21]

With Rowe omitted, I might use him as a Rookie loophole between Neade and Macaffer. Hopefully Caff pulls a big score tonight.

 

[LaffertyDaniel]

Trades are:
Rioli>Mayes (missed the price rise, but still the only best forward option for JS and scoring, as I can't use Rowe to get in Gawn)
Pittard>Grimes (consistently solid and reletively cheap, should be in the top 6 defenders for the year).

Leaves me with 80K left over and 0 doughnuts.

Next week:
Downgrades

Week after:
Daisy and Gray