ImissFrosty
Murphy's Law
- Banned
- #26
My team is still better overall, downgrading Ryan was a upgrade the useless campaigner.
Trades Round 6 Trades
- Thread starter buttox
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Banned
- #27
Change of plans.
Turning Butters to Tomahawk this week to take advantage of him kicking 15 on Norf at the Cattery. Grabbing Jones for Kosi too pending teams tomorrow arvo.
Then Round 6 going a touch early on Gulden and turning him into Neale as per my previous plan anyway. Might need to turn another stalling mid (Campbell or Berry) into F.Macrae a week early too.
Turning Butters to Tomahawk this week to take advantage of him kicking 15 on Norf at the Cattery. Grabbing Jones for Kosi too pending teams tomorrow arvo.
Then Round 6 going a touch early on Gulden and turning him into Neale as per my previous plan anyway. Might need to turn another stalling mid (Campbell or Berry) into F.Macrae a week early too.
- Thread starter
- #28
Tomahawk is going to do your head in.
Up and down kpf scoring.
He'll probably average enough to be a keeper.
This is not a trade for someone with an itchy trigger finger.
hope it works for you.
- Thread starter
- #29
You would never do a sideways trade if it made your team worse.
I have a SC rule that has served me well.
If you pay 400k+ for a player you owe them a month of games before cutting and running.
Ryan goes on massive runs and scores like a sp.
Thats what bumps his average up every year.
You have effectively been a premo down since you traded Ryan.
You have done it now so what your planning is good logic.
Get that $$ playing asap.
ImissFrosty
Murphy's Law
- Banned
- #30
Ryan was such a bad decision, lucky i jumped off early, never again. Went 86 and 53 and dropped 40k already. Campbell been shit but is making me cash and i can now be aggressive with the bank made from the cash gained from the trade plus i have all the must have rookies. Short term pain for long term gain, lost 59 points across 2 rounds but i dare say i'll make that up and some.
Still no idea what trades to do uncle Jisk.
Brockman > Waterman locked in with first trade.
Could hold second trade or finally get rid of bloody Jelly > Ridley via Laird.
Or Jelly > Waterman via Dunkley and Clark > Bowes.
Will probably sleep on it...
ImissFrosty
Murphy's Law
- Banned
- #36
You know what I'm saying kent
ImissFrosty
Murphy's Law
- Banned
- #37
Scott > Waterman done
263k in the bank
263k in the bank
JuddgementDay
Brownlow Medallist
Oea to Waterman - and that's it.
There's enough loop each week
Would probably be better Dunkley instead of Brockman though so Dunks can go to M4.
Gigantic
Brownlow Medallist
Rooks to L.Jones and Dunkley
it in.
it in.
rocker_oz33
TheBrownDog
Can I least do rd5 trades first FFS.
.
.
- Jun 7, 2011
- 5,170
- 13,522
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Maynard is looking juicy with Howe out.
Will Bucks keep playing Keira forward?
Will Bucks keep playing Keira forward?
rocker_oz33
TheBrownDog
rocker_oz33
TheBrownDog
Jones in for some Kent.
He was good last week.
Reid might be worth a look ...
He was good last week.
Reid might be worth a look ...
- Feb 27, 2011
- 15,854
- 17,872
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Might just do Fyfe > Jones so I have a bench spot up back.
Kadog
Brownlow Kentallist
- Feb 16, 2013
- 18,237
- 44,390
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Liverpool Detroit Lions
Most likely just one trade. Someone>L.Jones
- Dec 3, 2017
- 17,127
- 56,439
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
toxic
Hall of Famer
No trades required
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
Brockman or Fullarton to f macrae.
Considering L Jones just not sure how good his JS is.
Considering L Jones just not sure how good his JS is.
- Status
