So much was left to drift in the last few years, this is just another one of them.If thats true it reflects poorly on the coaches and managers at the club.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
So much was left to drift in the last few years, this is just another one of them.If thats true it reflects poorly on the coaches and managers at the club.
Assuming Bruce doesn't get up how about this for a radical idea - we play a ruckman in the ruck and a forward in the forward line.
Like it or not Longer is a perfect match for Mumford and that allows Marshall (who is actually referred to as a key forward/ruckman by the St Kilda FC) to play as - yep you guessed it - a key forward.
Assuming Bruce doesn't get up how about this for a radical idea - we play a ruckman in the ruck and a forward in the forward line.
Like it or not Longer is a perfect match for Mumford and that allows Marshall (who is actually referred to as a key forward/ruckman by the St Kilda FC) to play as - yep you guessed it - a key forward.
Should be average game then...The following stat shows how well our defence is going when we are ranked 12th for goals kicked in the comp and remain 6th on the ladder. Also GWS average 82 points a game and us 67 so I am predicting a loss by 15 points.
Thats logical.We need another tall if they are good players. If we brought marsh or played Marshall the second tall back would still go to membery because he would still clearly be our second best marking player. That is why there is no point in playing a tall for the sake of it.
Right now it could be argued that Battle is a better defender than forward, so keeping him back is what's best for his football and for the team.Marshall is a better ruck than Longer.
Battle is a better forward than Marshall.
Radical idea- let's play the best players available in their best positions.
Yes it is...But it doesn't mean they have to be mutually exclusive!Right now it could be argued that Battle is a better defender than forward, so keeping him back is what's team for his football and for the team.
In the absence of Jake... Throw Battle forward.Yes it is...But it doesn't mean they have to be mutually exclusive!
In desperate times for a week or two it does the boy no harm whatsoever to be let off the leash
And remind us all what a classy forward he is instinctively!
That part of his game doesn't go away overnight!
In these paranoid times, i must ask..........In the absence of Jake... Throw Battle forward.
I suggested we trade Ross and I'm typing this at Alfred emergency...In these paranoid times, i must ask..........
To be
Or not to be
What was the question?
In these paranoid times, i must ask..........
To be
Or not to be
What was the question?
That's some cryptic shit man!I suggested we trade Ross and I'm typing this at Alfred emergency...
That could be true. What we do know for sure is Marshall is a better ruck than longer. Playing both is madness. Robbing our best ruck by a margin to play an average forward.Right now it could be argued that Battle is a better defender than forward, so keeping him back is what's best for his football and for the team.
Fair enough but are we talking about this years best position or last years best position?Marshall is a better ruck than Longer.
Battle is a better forward than Marshall.
Radical idea- let's play the best players available in their best positions.
Yes it is...But it doesn't mean they have to be mutually exclusive!
In desperate times for a week or two it does the boy no harm whatsoever to be let off the leash
And remind us all what a classy forward he is instinctively!
That part of his game doesn't go away overnight!
Oh... you still think Longer is a ruckman...Assuming Bruce doesn't get up how about this for a radical idea - we play a ruckman in the ruck and a forward in the forward line.
Like it or not Longer is a perfect match for Mumford and that allows Marshall (who is actually referred to as a key forward/ruckman by the St Kilda FC) to play as - yep you guessed it - a key forward.
Oh... you still think Longer is any kind of footballer...
I agree that Marshall needs to play in the ruck. It's his best position by far and his mobility against Mumford could be an asset.That could be true. What we do know for sure is Marshall is a better ruck than longer. Playing both is madness. Robbing our best ruck by a margin to play an average forward.
I think marsh plays if bruce doesn’t because I think the club will want to keep battle back. I don’t have huge issues with that. I would have huge issues if marsh played as well as Bruce. If he is only option for Bruce well we have no choice. If bruce plays we have better choices than marsh.I agree that Marshall needs to play in the ruck. It's his best position by far and his mobility against Mumford could be an asset.
But I would also keep Battle in the backline. He has improved with every game and has started looking comfortable enough to go for marks instead of spoil and has started generating attack. He is a smart player and his kicking from the backline has been setting us up well. Joyce is a bit too much like Brown for mine, so would rather not have two dour defenders playing at once.
That only leaves Marsh as an option for an additional key forward, either if Bruce is injured or to play alongside him. There is the question marks over his fitness but if he has been named emergency twice then the club obviously feels he is fit enough for full game.
This is probably the first week this season that selection will be interesting because there is so many ways we could go.