TradeDraft
Post-Human
That the Video I meant
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If you want to go to school on accuracy, you will need to consider rushed behinds as well. Remove them from the "accuracy" consideration for both teams and you will see the Crows actual misses in a bit more light.
Dude, if you are going to add OOF to our shots on goal as a measure of inaccuracy, then remove the rushed behinds from each. It was 7-4 in our favour.I watched the game dude
It should have been over by half time
Some of them were unforgivable misses. Particularly Rankine's running in.
Doesn't change anything about what I initially said. We rushed a couple down their end too. It was 3.6 to 1.1 in the last quarter. So again...they missed at the start, we missed at the end.
Clearly we were backing our defensive system at that time, so that the risk reward was in favour of Moore playing fwd. I actually applaud the innovation in such a pressure situation - which I’m sure has been used often in our practice sessions.I know we won, but I’m not sure if I would have played Moore in the forward line with 2 minutes to go.
The ball was basically on our D50 and they had Walker/ Fogarty in their forward line.
Spot on. It somehow works simply because everyone in the movie makes the ludicrous seem possible. It is a gem.It‘s incredible filmmaking because the story is absolutely ludicrous and barely makes any sense even with it’s own internal logic and yet it still grabs you and provokes that kind of emotional response, every time.
Definitely got ahead of himself - and didn’t offer a source when asked.Perhaps mistaken. Chrispiesssss had said so, but could be wrong. Might have gotten ahead of myself!
More importantly, sending Moore forward is a statement of intent and belief. We're not trying to hold on, we're pushing to win.Clearly we were backing our defensive system at that time, so that the risk reward was in favour of Moore playing fwd. I actually applaud the innovation in such a pressure situation - which I’m sure has been used often in our practice sessions.
Moore went back eventually and marked in defence on the siren.
For those movie buffs out and about, this team should be know to the 17 other clubs as:
Baba Yaga
Opposition teams genuinely looked scared in last quarters when playing us.
Unplugged# I told you the view was better from the top
Agree, I'm not a WHE fan, in fairness, thought he was close to the most influencial player on the ground in those last two minutes - his running was amazing - so many one percenters, very impressed that he was the one that was covering Darcy so that he could lag off Walker and take that final mark.Hoskin-Elliott was important today.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Yep - reinforces the theory that all you get with more umpires is more inconsistency and more incorrect decisions. Astonishing that they can make 50:50 calls so often and then with 4 field umpires on the ground, they fail to correctly interpret blatant free kicksI thought the umpires got the three votes today.
They missed a few blatant ones the worst of which was Murphy (front on contact, high, blood nose, all of the above) and Ash Johnson’s over the shoulder mauling in the goal square.
Great win for the Pies.
What about the deliberate for not barging into injured Murph and the trainers/docs? lol
It's a great feelingI wasn't saying we shouldn't try and win, I was just saying it wouldn't have mattered that much if St Kilda won and kept the top spot. But yes, can't complain!
Agree, Fogerty had every right to attempt the front on spoil - as soon as he made contact above the shoulders it was a free.How could he have avoided that collision?
It was just a standard marking contest except for Fogarty’s disgraceful spoil attempt.
It's lucky Razor Ray didn't give the Ash Johnson decision, not only would he have not paid it he would have paid 3 50m penalties for dissent!
Definitely got ahead of himself - and didn’t offer a source when asked.
Players usually get front on contact when a fingernail brushes their chest. That was a disgrace as the umpire was side on and close to the incident and just waved his arms for play on. Prick.
Agree, Fogerty had every right to attempt the front on spoil - as soon as he made contact above the shoulders it was a free.
I might be wrong on this, I think Fogarty having his eyes on the ball ruled out the front on contact rule, you can always run back with the ball as long as you're watching the ball and not the player (otherwise, you'd never be able to take a mark running back with the ball and making front on contact) - what 4 umpires seemed to have missed is that Fogarty made forcible contact above the shoulder - that's a free kick every day of the week.
I thought the same thing. But then thinking about what happened in Q4, our reputation, etc... I wonder whether the pressure of 'having' to bury us actually got too much for them? You kick 5 on the Blues and you think "we're good from here". But not against the Pies.I watched the game dude
It should have been over by half time
Some of them were unforgivable misses. Particularly Rankine's running in.
Doesn't change anything about what I initially said. We rushed a couple down their end too. It was 3.6 to 1.1 in the last quarter. So again...they missed at the start, we missed at the end.
I think it would have been paid a free if it wasn't a goal - guess the umpire deemed that the tackle was in the action of executing the kick, so no additional free.Should’ve have Josh received another shot at goal when he was hit over the shoulder when he kicked the goal in the 4th?