- Nov 30, 2016
- 3,658
- 7,829
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
but what about his JS? he is nothing without his JS!Boak and Ryan out is good for Simpsons scoring.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but what about his JS? he is nothing without his JS!Boak and Ryan out is good for Simpsons scoring.
A better opponent is the best thing for Chapman’s scoring.Good for Chapman scoring?
My order from here on inThink I've settled on this.
If Rowe is named: Dunkley -> Robertson, Brockman -> Walsh/Bont/Petracca.
If Rowe isn't named: Dunkley -> Robertson, Rowe -> Walsh/Bont/Petracca.
Anybody care to make the case for one of those three SP's? The way I've listed them is my current order of preference, but it's changing constantly.
EDIT: There was a similar question above, I'll just look at the responses to that as they come through.
Where are all you Kent’s getting so much coin from? Lol this is madnessView attachment 1114160
Ive done one trade so far.
Dunkley to sidey is locked in.
with the second trade i have 3 options.
im leaning towards
1- Gulden to oliver. This leaves me 150k for next week which pretty much guarantees an upgrade.
2- Berry to oliver is possible leaving 50k
3- Brockman to oliver. removing a rookie who i dont expect to play over the next month. Owners may not get a chance to move him on for a long time.
Where are all you Kent’s getting so much coin from? Lol this is madness
Where are all you Kent’s getting so much coin from? Lol this is madness
I’m getting BBB in unsighted. fu** it.
Think I've settled on this.
If Rowe is named: Dunkley -> Robertson, Brockman -> Walsh/Bont/Petracca.
If Rowe isn't named: Dunkley -> Robertson, Rowe -> Walsh/Bont/Petracca.
Anybody care to make the case for one of those three SP's? The way I've listed them is my current order of preference, but it's changing constantly.
EDIT: There was a similar question above, I'll just look at the responses to that as they come through.
I'd go C. With how quickly players are dropping this year, i'd keep someone who is still playing even if they are at risk of not hitting their BE.Alright puppies and kentlemen, give me your thoughts:
View attachment 1114100
Plenty of cash in the pusswah!
Option A - Midfield Grab - $134k remaining
View attachment 1114101
- get the #2 and #3 pure midfielders into my side
- (just) leaves enough money for Chapman > May the next week
- must be at the expense of Gulden
Option B - Midfield Value - $242k remaining
View attachment 1114103
- get the value midfielders into my side (Walsh / Guthrie?)
- leaves money for both May and BBB over the next few weeks without downgrades
- is still at the expense of Gulden
Option C - Dead Rookie Bounce - $146k remaining
View attachment 1114109
- get the value midfielders into my side (Walsh / Guthrie?)
- leaves enough money for Chapman > May the next week
- gets rid of dud rookies from my bench (Berry, Rowe - whichever isnt named?)
- lets Gulden potentially moo a bit more
With May in next week, i'll look to sure up my forward line a bit more, firstly with BBB as a cheap get and also Marshall
Appreciate your ridicule - cheers!
Ben mckay will go to one melbourne forward and do well.Tempted to just grab Ben Brown now for a feast vs Norf
When did Ben Brown become Tony Lockett?
Gulden to Heppell?Honestly having no cash in the bank is ******* killing me so hard. I have the cash generation but no cash in the bank. I need to trade Dunkley to number 7 from Norf. Leaves me with 90k left. Cant do a ******* thing.
Why do you have to trade him in, though?Really dawning on me now how much not starting Norfs number 7 has killed my side. I gotta trade him in this week through Dunkley. Now if I had started him, I could've downgraded Dunkley to Brayshaw, banked the 100 odd thousand and then upgraded Gulden to a premo. But now I cant do anything, just gonna take the hit this week to my ranking and my cash league.
He didn't.
You do understand the concept of relative value, don't you?
Yeah but every campaigner has him. It is killing me every week. I have won three of my cash leage games by under 100 points purely because I didn't have number 7 from Norf. Against Geelong I had like 15 points and Tom Stewart Vs number 7 from Norf and I won by 8 points. If I had have started him I would be in the top 5k.Why do you have to trade him in, though?
It's jumping into a position after a hundreds of thousands and a heap of points have already flowed under the bridge.
If I didn't have him now, I'd be keener on avoiding him and hoping to profit if a hiccup comes along.