Trades Round 9 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Brockman, Gulden out RCD, Poulter in.

Holding Berry as he's likely to play and not much different in price. Also means I have cover if Cerra isn't back in.

360k in the bank for upgrades next week. Dusty if he's bottomed out and maybe Marshall.
 
Quick scenario

Option 1
Robertson gulden
To
Steele and poulter
Then next week with the funds
Powell to Ridley
Warner to Heeney

or
Option 2
Waterman gulden
To
Steele poulter
Then
Robertson/Flynn to rookie
And
Powell to trac/jelly

Option 1
 
WaynesWorld19 after teams named mate, what are your thoughts on keeping Warner and trading Rowe and brockman instead to poulter and rcd. Would still give me 180k but keeping all the good and high priced rookies
I traded Rowe last week, B4 his 80+ score .....don't regret because he's a dud away from AO

I traded Warner this week, simply because it was him or Jordon for the cash .....Jordon still rising in value, Warner on the decline

Your trades depend on your plans for the next two weeks / byes

I kept Brockman because I need his DPP .....yes I'd trade Rowe first, but just depends on how many $$$ you need moving fwd

I've done a complete backflip on everything I said during the week ......I didn't get Ridley because of highmore ....I ended up bringing Poulter into F6 , had to otherwise I was wearing a donut

:padlock: Warner to Poulter
:padlock: Berry to RCD ....never wanted to trade, but I now have $550K in the bank plus the $200K from Flynn next week
 
Quick scenario

Option 1
Robertson gulden
To
Steele and poulter
Then next week with the funds
Powell to Ridley
Warner to Heeney

or
Option 2
Waterman gulden
To
Steele poulter
Then
Robertson/Flynn to rookie
And
Powell to trac/jelly
I like Option 2 . Give Robbo another week. Might just pull out a big score.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Worth culling Robertson who’s named over waterman who may not be named?
Depends on your coverage. Figured you must be ok if you're considering trading out a green dot player.

I reckon Waterman will get games. I'd only be 50/50 on it being this week though. If your trade needs him playing this week I'd say it's too risky.
 
Depends on your coverage. Figured you must be ok if you're considering trading out a green dot player.

I reckon Waterman will get games. I'd only be 50/50 on it being this week though. If your trade needs him playing this week I'd say it's too risky.
Trading waterman gives me 28 green dots and Murphy who’ll be back next week
Best position I’ve been in ages rookie wise

waterman is fringe in a bad sad
Robertson in a winning team but bad role

Robertson Good js 280k dpp
Waterman poetentially back made no money

it helps with Heeney and Ridley next week but can also get Heeney the week after and get a trac Type next week in the guts

have 16 keepers regardless of trade
 
I like Option 2 . Give Robbo another week. Might just pull out a big score.
Yeah dpp helps
Just affects my moves next week
But plan was to bring in Steele and can do it this week without the headache or worrying about waterman

might look silly but have already done that with Kossie and Ascott so far 😂
This way Robertson is f7 for this week
If he flops again he and Powell become a rookie and super premo mid
 
I traded Rowe last week, B4 his 80+ score .....don't regret because he's a dud away from AO

I traded Warner this week, simply because it was him or Jordon for the cash .....Jordon still rising in value, Warner on the decline

Your trades depend on your plans for the next two weeks / byes

I kept Brockman because I need his DPP .....yes I'd trade Rowe first, but just depends on how many $$$ you need moving fwd

I've done a complete backflip on everything I said during the week ......I didn't get Ridley because of highmore ....I ended up bringing Poulter into F6 , had to otherwise I was wearing a donut

:padlock: Warner to Poulter
:padlock: Berry to RCD ....never wanted to trade, but I now have $550K in the bank plus the $200K from Flynn next week
The trades will give me 180k mate but will still have Warner Bergman Scott McNeill Jordan Powell Flynn and I have Ely smith as my dpp player, Flynn will go next week so will be able to grab anyone and from there can do 1 up 1 down until teams completed.
my only concern is will I slip back from the pack if I don’t upgrade
 
Trading waterman gives me 28 green dots and Murphy who’ll be back next week
Best position I’ve been in ages rookie wise

waterman is fringe in a bad sad
Robertson in a winning team but bad role

Robertson Good js 280k dpp
Waterman poetentially back made no money

it helps with Heeney and Ridley next week but can also get Heeney the week after and get a trac Type next week in the guts

have 16 keepers regardless of trade
Sounds like you've got it sorted already :thumbsu:
 
With Mansell surviving and Highmore coming back from purgatory I can now shift Kosi for Byrnes and not worry about having to field Mansell.
Gonna move Mansell on next week but he stays this week due to his 14 BE compared to Kosi's 60 BE.

Warner > Poulter still going ahead.

481k itb for a double up next week.

Hopefully can eek out a bit more cash from Mansell.
 
Really stumped on what to do this week:

rX5h36o.jpg


Option 1:

8lkdiG3.jpg


Option 2:

fuHgJva.jpg


Option 3:

7WhhfVy.jpg


Option 4:

rYih6q0.jpg


Option 5:

92NwUcD.jpg
 
The trades will give me 180k mate but will still have Warner Bergman Scott McNeill Jordan Powell Flynn and I have Ely smith as my dpp player, Flynn will go next week so will be able to grab anyone and from there can do 1 up 1 down until teams completed.
my only concern is will I slip back from the pack if I don’t upgrade
Yes, I 've had the jitters since being resigned to not bring in Ridley this week .....2nd choice was Kelly, but he has to replace Jordon who's slated to rise $23K playing CARL .....next was Dusty, but he's slated to decrease $40K

No ....as much as I hate it, I have to play the long game .....and yes my raanking will slip
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top